Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34504519›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2021

English Feature Recognition Based on GA-BP Neural Network Algorithm and Data Mining.

Dan Wu, Yuanjun Shen

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dan WuSchool of English Education, Xi'an International Studies University, Xi'an 710128, Shaanxi Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7458-8383
Yuanjun ShenUniversity College London, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of society and the promotion of science and technology, English, as the largest universal language in the world, is used by more and more people. In the life around us, there is information in English all the time. However, because the process of manual recognition of English letters is very labor-intensive and inefficient, the demand for computer recognition of English letters is increasing. This paper studies the influence of the parameters of BP neural network and genetic algorithm on the whole network, including the input, output, and number of hidden layer nodes. Finally, it improves and determines the settings and values of the relevant parameters. On this basis, it shows the rationality of the selected parameters through experiments. The results show that only GA-BP neural network and feature data mining algorithm can complete feature extraction and become the main function of feature classification at the same time. After enough initial data sample analysis training, the GA-BP neural network was found to have good data fault tolerance and feature recognition. The experimental results show that the genetic algorithm can find the best weights and thresholds and the weights and thresholds are given to the BP neural network. After training, the recognition of handwritten letters can be realized. Finally, the convergence of the two algorithms is compared through experiments, which shows that the overall performance of the BP neural network algorithm is improved after genetic algorithm optimization. It can be seen that the genetic algorithm has a good effect in improving the BP neural network and this method has a broad prospect in English feature recognition.

Indexed as

LanguageNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsData AnalysisData MiningHumans

Identifiers

PMID34504519
PMCPMC8423560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.