Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34504258›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Development and validation of a novel HILIC method for the quantification of low-levels of cuprizone in cuprizone-containing chow.

Fengmei Zheng, Yiqing Lin, Pierre Boulas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fengmei ZhengPharmaceutical Development, Biogen, 225 Binney St., Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA. Fengmei.zheng@Biogen.com.
Yiqing LinPharmaceutical Development, Biogen, 225 Binney St., Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
Pierre BoulasPharmaceutical Development, Biogen, 225 Binney St., Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cuprizone is an amide compound that has been wildly used in various animal studies, such as in the investigation of remyelination in mouse model. It is important to control the amount of cuprizone dosed in animals to be consistent as different amounts may lead to different clinical observations. Cuprizone is usually administrated as a minor component (i.e., 0.3%) of a mixture with powdered or pelleted rodent chow. Its low content, combined with the complex nature of chow, represents a significant challenge for the quantification of cuprizone in the mixture. To the best of our knowledge, no method has been reported in the literature so far. In this study, a simple, selective, and sensitive hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatographic method was developed for the quantification of cuprizone in cuprizone pre-clinical formulations. The analytical method comprises a fast ultrasound assisted extraction with acetonitrile/water as a solvent followed by gradient separation using a Waters Xbridge HILIC column with 0.1% TFA in water and acetonitrile as mobile phases and UV detection at 220 nm. The specificity, linearity, accuracy, repeatability, and limit of quantitation (LOQ) of the method were established. The method was determined to be linear in the range of 10-200 μg/mL. Accuracy was assessed by spiking a chow placebo with various amounts of a cuprizone reference standard to achieve target concentration levels and the recoveries were within the acceptance criterion of 90-110% of the target concentrations. Repeatability was demonstrated at the nominal concentration of 100 µg/mL and LOQ level of 2.5 μg/mL. This method has been demonstrated to be suitable for its intended use and has been successfully applied to the quantification of low levels of cuprizone in chow formulations. It was found that the cuprizone content in chow could varied significantly between batches and the potential causes of the variability were investigated.

Identifiers

PMID34504258
PMCPMC8429673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.