Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34504190›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Effects of gender, age, experience, and practice on driver reaction and acceptance of traffic jam chauffeur systems.

Husam Muslim, Makoto Itoh, Cho Kiu Liang, Jacobo Antona-Makoshi, Nobuyuki Uchida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Husam MuslimJapan Automobile Research Institution, 2530 Karima, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0822, Japan. ahusam@jari.or.jp.
Makoto ItohFaculty of Engineering, Information and Systems, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8573, Japan.
Cho Kiu LiangGraduate School of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8573, Japan.
Jacobo Antona-MakoshiJapan Automobile Research Institution, 2530 Karima, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0822, Japan.
Nobuyuki UchidaJapan Automobile Research Institution, 2530 Karima, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0822, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study conducted a driving simulation experiment to compare four automated driving systems (ADS) designs during lane change demanding traffic situations on highways while accounting for the drivers' gender, age, experience, and practice. A lane-change maneuver was required when the automated vehicle approaches traffic congestion on the left-hand lane. ADS-1 can only reduce the speed to synchronize with the congestion. ADS-2 reduces the speed and issues an optional request to intervene, advising the driver to change lanes manually. ADS-3 offers to overtake the congestion autonomously if the driver approves it. ADS-4 overtakes the congestion autonomously without the driver's approval. Results of drivers' reaction, acceptance, and trust indicated that differences between ADS designs increase when considering the combined effect of drivers' demographic factors more than the individual effect of each factor. However, the more ADS seems to have driver-like capacities, the more impact of demographic factors is expected. While preliminary, these findings may help us understand how ADS users' behavior can differ based on the interaction between human demographic factors and system design.

Indexed as

Age FactorsSex FactorsAccidents, TrafficAdultAgedAutomobile DrivingComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTask Performance and AnalysisTrustYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34504190
PMCPMC8429645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.