Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34503996›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

Generalizable EEG Encoding Models with Naturalistic Audiovisual Stimuli.

Maansi Desai, Jade Holder, Cassandra Villarreal, Nat Clark, Brittany Hoang, Liberty S Hamilton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maansi DesaiDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Moody College of Communication, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712.
Jade HolderDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Moody College of Communication, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712.
Cassandra VillarrealDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Moody College of Communication, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712.
Nat ClarkDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Moody College of Communication, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712.
Brittany HoangDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Moody College of Communication, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712.
Liberty S HamiltonDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Moody College of Communication, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712 liberty.hamilton@austin.utexas.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0182-2500

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In natural conversations, listeners must attend to what others are saying while ignoring extraneous background sounds. Recent studies have used encoding models to predict electroencephalography (EEG) responses to speech in noise-free listening situations, sometimes referred to as "speech tracking." Researchers have analyzed how speech tracking changes with different types of background noise. It is unclear, however, whether neural responses from acoustically rich, naturalistic environments with and without background noise can be generalized to more controlled stimuli. If encoding models for acoustically rich, naturalistic stimuli are generalizable to other tasks, this could aid in data collection from populations of individuals who may not tolerate listening to more controlled and less engaging stimuli for long periods of time. We recorded noninvasive scalp EEG while 17 human participants (8 male/9 female) listened to speech without noise and audiovisual speech stimuli containing overlapping speakers and background sounds. We fit multivariate temporal receptive field encoding models to predict EEG responses to pitch, the acoustic envelope, phonological features, and visual cues in both stimulus conditions. Our results suggested that neural responses to naturalistic stimuli were generalizable to more controlled datasets. EEG responses to speech in isolation were predicted accurately using phonological features alone, while responses to speech in a rich acoustic background were more accurate when including both phonological and acoustic features. Our findings suggest that naturalistic audiovisual stimuli can be used to measure receptive fields that are comparable and generalizable to more controlled audio-only stimuli.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultBrainElectroencephalographyElectrooculographyFemaleHumansMaleMotion PicturesPhotic StimulationSpeech PerceptionYoung Adultelectroencephalographyencoding modelsnatural stimulispectrotemporal receptive fieldspeech perception

Identifiers

PMID34503996
PMCPMC8549533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.