ArticleBMC nursing2021
Psychometric evaluation of medication safety competence scale for clinical nurses.
Article in BMC nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Influencing Medication Safety Competence of Nurses According to Clinical Career Stage: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Nursing & health sciences · 2026Article
- Factors Associated With Medication Safety Competence Among Clinical Nurses in China: A Latent Profile Analysis.The journal of nursing research : JNR · 2026Article
- Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the quality of life in pregnancy scale (PREG-QOL): a translation and validation study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Development and validation of the critical care practical competency scale for clinical nurses.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Psychometric evaluation and clustering of the Chinese Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised (CIQ-R) among older adults: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Cross-cultural validation of the Chinese version of the lean management scale for nursing services in hospitals.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the biobehavioural pain and movement questionnaire (BioPMovQ) in elderly CMP patients.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the shortened version of the RFL-OA scale (SRFL-OA).BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Relationship between Medication Safety Competence and Perception of Medication Administration Errors among Clinical Nurses: A Cross-sectional Study.Journal of caring sciences · 2025Review
- Psychometric characteristics of the Chinese version of the patient participation scale.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of patient safety culture scale in medication administration.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the sickness presenteeism scale- nurse (C-SPS-N): a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- The Chinese version of the PERMA profiler: a validity and reliability study.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Instruments for Measuring Healthcare Professionals' Medication Safety Competence: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the hospital-acquired insomnia scale (HAIS) and analysis of influencing factors.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- The falls health literacy scale: translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Chinese version.BMC public health · 2024Article
- An analysis of the psychometric properties of the medication safety competence scale in Turkish.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Information Security Attitude Questionnaire for nurses.Nursing open · 2024Article
- Reliability and validity of the cancer-related dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep scale in cancer patients.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Scale of Effects of Social Media on Eating Behaviour and research of its influencing factors.BMC public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNurses are the most important members of the health care system for medication safety, there are few tools to evaluate their medication safety competence. This study aimed to translate the Medication Safety Competence Scale into Chinese and validate its reliability and validity among clinical nurses.
methodsA total of 894 clinical nurses were recruited from three cities in China. The original version of the Medication Safety Competence Scale was translated into Chinese using the backward and forward translation procedure. The reliability of the scale was measured by internal consistency, split-half reliability, and stability. The validity of the scale was assessed by the content validity index, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis.
resultsThe Cronbach's coefficient of the scale was 0.940, and the coefficient values for the six domains ranged between 0.843 and 0.948. The split-half reliability and stability were 0.671 and 0.703, respectively. The content validity index of the scale was 0.952. The 6-factor structure, supported by the eigenvalues, total variance explained, and scree plot accounted for 71.485 % of the total variance. Moreover, as a result of the confirmatory factor analysis, the average variance extracted values were 0.55 to 0.70, and the model fitting indexes were all in the acceptable range.
conclusionsThe Chinese version of the Medication Safety Competence Scale had ideal reliability and validity among clinical nurses. The evaluation results of the scale can provide a reference for nursing managers to formulate education plans and intervention measures to improve clinical nurses' safe medication competence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.