Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34503461›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2021

Healthcare professionals' practice and interactions in older peoples' cross-sectoral clinical care trajectories when acutely hospitalized - a qualitative observation study.

Maiken Hjuler Persson, Christian Backer Mogensen, Jens Søndergaard, Helene Skjøt-Arkil, Pernille Tanggaard Andersen

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maiken Hjuler PerssonEmergency Department, Hospital Sønderjylland, Kresten Philipsens Vej 15, 6200, Aabenraa, Denmark. Maiken.Hjuler.Persson@rsyd.dk.
Christian Backer MogensenEmergency Department, Hospital Sønderjylland, Kresten Philipsens Vej 15, 6200, Aabenraa, Denmark.
Jens SøndergaardResearch Unit of General Practice, J. B. Winsløws Vej 9A, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Helene Skjøt-ArkilEmergency Department, Hospital Sønderjylland, Kresten Philipsens Vej 15, 6200, Aabenraa, Denmark.
Pernille Tanggaard AndersenResearch Unit for Health Promotion, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Degnevej 14, 6705, Esbjerg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare services have become more complex, globally and nationally. Denmark is renowned for an advanced and robust healthcare system, aiming at a less fragmented structure. However, challenges within the coordination of care remain. Comprehensive restructures based on marketization and efficiency, e.g. New Public Management (NPM) strategies has gained momentum in Denmark including. Simultaneously, changes to healthcare professionals' identities have affected the relationship between patients and healthcare professionals, and patient involvement in decision-making was acknowledged as a quality- and safety measure. An understanding of a less linear patient pathway can give rise to conflict in the care practice. Social scientists, including Jürgen Habermas, have highlighted the importance of communication, particularly when shared decision-making models were introduced. Healthcare professionals must simultaneously deliver highly effective services and practice person-centered care. Co-morbidities of older people further complicate healthcare professionals' practice.

aimThis study aimed to explore and analyse how healthcare professionals' interactions and practice influence older peoples' clinical care trajectory when admitted to an emergency department (ED) and the challenges that emerged.

methodsThis qualitative study arises from a hermeneutical stand within the interpretative paradigm. Focusing on the healthcare professionals' interactions and practice we followed the clinical care trajectories of seven older people (aged > 65, receiving daily homecare) acutely hospitalized to the ED. Participant observations were combined with interviews with healthcare professionals involved in the clinical care trajectory. We followed-up with the older person by phone call until four weeks after discharge. The study followed the code of conduct for research integrity and is reported in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) guidelines.

resultsThe analysis revealed four themes: 1)"The end justifies the means - 'I know what is best for you'", 2)"Basic needs of care overruled by system effectiveness", 3)"Treatment as a bargain", and 4)"Healthcare professionals as solo detectives".

conclusionDissonance between system logics and the goal of person-centered care disturb the healthcare practice and service culture negatively affecting the clinical care trajectory. A practice culture embracing better communication and more person-centered care should be enhanced to improve the quality of care in cross-sectoral trajectories.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelProfessional PracticeAgedCommunicationDecision MakingHospitalizationHumansPatient ParticipationQualitative ResearchClinical care trajectoriesField observationsHabermasHealthcareHealthcare professionalsInterprofessionalIntersectoralOlder peoplePerson-centeredQualitative

Identifiers

PMID34503461
PMCPMC8431887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.