Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34503259›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Clinical Importance of Regimens in Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Macrovascular Invasion.

Takashi Niizeki, Hideki Iwamoto, Tomotake Shirono, Shigeo Shimose, Masahito Nakano, Shusuke Okamura, Yu Noda, Naoki Kamachi, Suzuki Hiroyuki, Miwa Sakai and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takashi NiizekiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume 830-0011, Japan.
Hideki IwamotoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume 830-0011, Japan.
Tomotake ShironoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume 830-0011, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2662-6779
Shigeo ShimoseDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume 830-0011, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2068-8386
Masahito NakanoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume 830-0011, Japan.
Shusuke OkamuraDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume 830-0011, Japan.
Yu NodaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume 830-0011, Japan.
Naoki KamachiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume 830-0011, Japan.
Suzuki HiroyukiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume 830-0011, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2383-5038
Miwa SakaiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume 830-0011, Japan.
Ryoko KuromatsuDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume 830-0011, Japan.
Hironori KogaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume 830-0011, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5814-9543
Takuji TorimuraDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume 830-0011, Japan.
Kurume University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI) is a poor prognostic factor in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is a promising treatment in MVI-HCC. However, it is not clear which regimens are suitable for HAIC. In this study, we aimed to compare the therapeutic effects between New FP (a fine-powder cisplatin suspended with lipiodol plus 5-fluorouracil) and low dose FP (LFP/cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil) in the treatment of MVI-HCC patients with Child-Pugh class A. New FP is a regimen that consists of a fine-powder cisplatin suspended with lipiodol and 5-fluorouracil. Fifty-one patients were treated with LFP, and 99 patients were New FP. We compared the therapeutic effects of LFP and New FP and assessed factors that associated with the therapeutic effects. The median survival and progression-free survival times of LFP and New FP were 16.1/24.7 and 5.4/8.8 months, respectively (

Indexed as

hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapyhepatocellular carcinomalow dose FPmacrovascular invasionNew FPvascular invasion

Identifiers

PMID34503259
PMCPMC8431395
OpenAlexW3198079369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.