Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34503256›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Darwinian Approaches for Cancer Treatment: Benefits of Mathematical Modeling.

Sophia Belkhir, Frederic Thomas, Benjamin Roche

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. MRI-based habitat imaging predicts high-risk molecular subtypes and early risk assessment of lower-grade gliomas.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Metastasis Models: Thermodynamics and Complexity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Darwinian perspective on tumor immune evasion.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2022
    Review
  12. Adaptive Control of Tumor Growth.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sophia BelkhirCREEC/MIVEGEC, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, 34394 Montpellier, France.
Frederic ThomasCREEC/MIVEGEC, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, 34394 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2238-1978
Benjamin RocheCREEC/MIVEGEC, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, 34394 Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the major problems of traditional anti-cancer treatments is that they lead to the emergence of treatment-resistant cells, which results in treatment failure. To avoid or delay this phenomenon, it is relevant to take into account the eco-evolutionary dynamics of tumors. Designing evolution-based treatment strategies may help overcoming the problem of drug resistance. In particular, a promising candidate is adaptive therapy, a containment strategy which adjusts treatment cycles to the evolution of the tumors in order to keep the population of treatment-resistant cells under control. Mathematical modeling is a crucial tool to understand the dynamics of cancer in response to treatments, and to make predictions about the outcomes of these treatments. In this review, we highlight the benefits of in silico modeling to design adaptive therapy strategies, and to assess whether they could effectively improve treatment outcomes. Specifically, we review how two main types of models (i.e., mathematical models based on Lotka-Volterra equations and agent-based models) have been used to model tumor dynamics in response to adaptive therapy. We give examples of the advances they permitted in the field of adaptive therapy and discuss about how these models can be integrated in experimental approaches and clinical trial design.

Indexed as

adaptive therapyagent-based modelscancer evolutionLotka–Volterra models

Identifiers

PMID34503256
PMCPMC8431137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.