Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34503191›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Sampling, Logistics, and Analytics of Urine for RT-qPCR-based Diagnostics.

Rosel Kretschmer-Kazemi Far, Kirsten Frank, Georg Sczakiel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rosel Kretschmer-Kazemi FarInstitut für Molekulare Medizin, Universität zu Lübeck and UKSH, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2363-7499
Kirsten FrankInstitut für Molekulare Medizin, Universität zu Lübeck and UKSH, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Georg SczakielInstitut für Molekulare Medizin, Universität zu Lübeck and UKSH, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3668-4443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body fluids in the context of cancer diagnosis are the primary source of liquid biopsy, i.e., biomarker detection that includes blood and serum, urine, and saliva. RNA represents a particular class of biomarkers because it is thought to monitor the current status of gene expression in humans, in organs, and if present, also in tumors. In case of bladder cancer, we developed a scheme that describes, in detail, all steps from the collection of urine samples from patients, stabilization of samples, their transportation, storage, and marker analysis by qPCR-based technology. We find that urine samples prepared according to this protocol show stability of RNA over more than 10 days at unchilled temperatures during shipping. A specific procedure of primer design and amplicon evaluation allows a specific assignment of PCR products to human genomics and transcriptomics data collections. In summary, we describe a technical option for the robust acquisition of urine samples and the quantitative detection of RNA-based tumor markers in case of bladder cancer patients. This protocol is for general use, and we describe that it works for any RNA-based tumor marker in urine of cancer patients.

Indexed as

primer designRNA isolationRNA stabilityRT-qPCRtumor marker

Identifiers

PMID34503191
PMCPMC8430584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.