ArticleCancers2021
Socio-Territorial Inequities in the French National Breast Cancer Screening Programme-A Cross-Sectional Multilevel Study.
Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of an intervention theory for a mobile mammography unit research project for breast cancer screening.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026Trial
- Transportation-related factors, cancer screening, and stage at diagnosis: A scoping review.PloS one · 2026Article
- A scoping review of multiple deprivation indices in Europe.European journal of public health · 2025Article
- A Life course approach to investigate breast cancer and migration in the greater Paris area: the SENOVIE study protocol.BMJ open · 2025Observational
- Evaluation of the Slovenian Breast Cancer Screening Programme: Years of Life Gained and Avoided Deaths.Cancers · 2025Article
- From genetic risk to early detection - clinical outcomes of a person-centered screening program for women with a high genetic risk of breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- A psychometric analysis for the adaptation of the comprehensive breast cancer knowledge test for the male population: a methodological study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Factors Influencing Adherence to the Risk Management Program for Women With a Genetic Predisposition to Breast Cancer: Real-World Data from a French Multicenter Program.The oncologist · 2024Article
- Factors associated with deferral or non-performance of an organized breast cancer screening program during the COVID-19 pandemic in France.Cancer medicine · 2024Observational
- Factors influencing participation in breast cancer screening in an urban setting. A study of organized and individual opportunistic screening among potentially active and retired women in the city of Nice.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Can an Ecological Index of Deprivation Be Used at the Country Level? The Case of the French Version of the European Deprivation Index (F-EDI).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFrance implemented in 2004 the French National Breast Cancer Screening Programme (FNBCSP). Despite national recommendations, this programme coexists with non-negligible opportunistic screening practices.
aimAnalyse socio-territorial inequities in the 2013-2014 FNBCSP campaign in a large sample of the eligible population.
methodAnalyses were performed using three-level hierarchical generalized linear model. Level one was a 10% random sample of the eligible population in each
resultsOrganized screening uptake increased with age (OR
conclusionFNBCSP does not erase socio-territorial inequities. The population the most at risk of dying from breast cancer is thus the less participating. More efforts are needed to improve equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.