Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34503027›Full record

ArticlePolymers2021

Modeling and Simulation of Fabricated Graphene Nanoplates/Polystyrene Nanofibrous Membrane for DCMD.

Ahmad Abdullah, Abdulaziz Al-Qahatani, Mohammed Alquraish, Colin Bailey, Ahmed El-Shazly, Salah El-Mofty

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ahmad AbdullahDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Bisha, P.O. Box 551, Bisha 67614, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2538-8120
Abdulaziz Al-QahataniDepartment of Biology, College of Science, University of Bisha, P.O. Box 551, Bisha 61922, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlquraishDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Bisha, P.O. Box 551, Bisha 67614, Saudi Arabia.
Colin BaileySchool of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.
Ahmed El-ShazlyChemical and Petrochemicals Engineering Department, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST), Alexandria 21934, Egypt.
Salah El-MoftyDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Bisha, P.O. Box 551, Bisha 67614, Saudi Arabia.
University of Bisha · SAEgypt-Japan University of Science and Technology · EGQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Deputyship for Research and Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia UB-13-1442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane distillation is an active technique that provides pure water with very good rejection and could be applied to water of extremely high salinity. The low productivity of membrane distillation needs intensive efforts to be competitive with other desalination techniques. In this current study, a composite (PS/GNP) membrane, which is composed of polystyrene (PS) based and 0.25% weight percent graphene nanoplates (GNP) has been fabricated via electrospinning and compared with the blank PS membrane. SEM, FTIR, contact angle and porosity characterization have been performed, and the results show that the validity of the predefined conditions, and the contact angle of the composite membrane, which is found to be 91.68°, proved the hydrophobic nature of the composite membrane. A numerical simulation using Ansys 2020 software has been introduced to study the performance of the fabricated composite membrane when used in direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD). The numerical model has been validated with experimental work from the literature and showed an excellent match. The blank PS and composite PS/GNP membranes have been investigated and compared at different operating conditions, i.e., hot water supply temperature and system flow rate. The results show that the composite PS/GNP membrane outperforms the blank PS membrane at all studied operating conditions.

Indexed as

CFDcomposite membraneDCMDgraphene nanoplatespolystyreneSEM

Identifiers

PMID34503027
PMCPMC8434232
OpenAlexW3196889604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.