Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34502795›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Evaluation of Task Scheduling Algorithms in Heterogeneous Computing Environments.

Roxana-Gabriela Stan, Lidia Băjenaru, Cătălin Negru, Florin Pop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roxana-Gabriela StanComputer Science and Engineering Department, University Politehnica of Bucharest (UPB), 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4693-5541
Lidia BăjenaruComputer Science and Engineering Department, University Politehnica of Bucharest (UPB), 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1800-3897
Cătălin NegruComputer Science and Engineering Department, University Politehnica of Bucharest (UPB), 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0680-0212
Florin PopComputer Science and Engineering Department, University Politehnica of Bucharest (UPB), 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4566-1545

Funding

University Politehnica of Bucharest PubArt
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work establishes a set of methodologies to evaluate the performance of any task scheduling policy in heterogeneous computing contexts. We formally state a scheduling model for hybrid edge-cloud computing ecosystems and conduct simulation-based experiments on large workloads. In addition to the conventional cloud datacenters, we consider edge datacenters comprising smartphone and Raspberry Pi edge devices, which are battery powered. We define realistic capacities of the computational resources. Once a schedule is found, the various task demands can or cannot be fulfilled by the resource capacities. We build a scheduling and evaluation framework and measure typical scheduling metrics such as mean waiting time, mean turnaround time, makespan, throughput on the Round-Robin, Shortest Job First, Min-Min and Max-Min scheduling schemes. Our analysis and results show that the state-of-the-art independent task scheduling algorithms suffer from performance degradation in terms of significant task failures and nonoptimal resource utilization of datacenters in heterogeneous edge-cloud mediums in comparison to cloud-only mediums. In particular, for large sets of tasks, due to low battery or limited memory, more than 25% of tasks fail to execute for each scheduling scheme.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsEcosystemCloud ComputingComputer SimulationWorkloadheterogeneous computinghybrid edge–cloud environmentsperformance evaluation frameworktask scheduling

Identifiers

PMID34502795
PMCPMC8433676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.