Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34502702›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Detection of COVID-19 Using Transfer Learning and Grad-CAM Visualization on Indigenously Collected X-ray Dataset.

Muhammad Umair, Muhammad Shahbaz Khan, Fawad Ahmed, Fatmah Baothman, Fehaid Alqahtani, Muhammad Alian, Jawad Ahmad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. RADIC:A tool for diagnosing COVID-19 from chest CT and X-ray scans using deep learning and quad-radiomics.Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems : an international journal sponsored by the Chemometrics Society · 2023
    Article
  16. A fuzzy fine-tuned model for COVID-19 diagnosis.Computers in biology and medicine · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muhammad UmairDepartment of Electrical Engineering, HITEC University, Taxila 47080, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-3971-2067
Muhammad Shahbaz KhanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, HITEC University, Taxila 47080, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-7166-6681
Fawad AhmedDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, HITEC University, Taxila 47080, Pakistan.
Fatmah BaothmanFaculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah 21431, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0344-1007
Fehaid AlqahtaniDepartment of Computer Science, King Fahad Naval Academy, Al Jubail 35512, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9564-6653
Muhammad AlianDepartment of Electrical Engineering, HITEC University, Taxila 47080, Pakistan.
Jawad AhmadSchool of Computing, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6289-8248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak began in December 2019 and has dreadfully affected our lives since then. More than three million lives have been engulfed by this newest member of the corona virus family. With the emergence of continuously mutating variants of this virus, it is still indispensable to successfully diagnose the virus at early stages. Although the primary technique for the diagnosis is the PCR test, the non-contact methods utilizing the chest radiographs and CT scans are always preferred. Artificial intelligence, in this regard, plays an essential role in the early and accurate detection of COVID-19 using pulmonary images. In this research, a transfer learning technique with fine tuning was utilized for the detection and classification of COVID-19. Four pre-trained models i.e., VGG16, DenseNet-121, ResNet-50, and MobileNet were used. The aforementioned deep neural networks were trained using the dataset (available on Kaggle) of 7232 (COVID-19 and normal) chest X-ray images. An indigenous dataset of 450 chest X-ray images of Pakistani patients was collected and used for testing and prediction purposes. Various important parameters, e.g., recall, specificity, F1-score, precision, loss graphs, and confusion matrices were calculated to validate the accuracy of the models. The achieved accuracies of VGG16, ResNet-50, DenseNet-121, and MobileNet are 83.27%, 92.48%, 96.49%, and 96.48%, respectively. In order to display feature maps that depict the decomposition process of an input image into various filters, a visualization of the intermediate activations is performed. Finally, the Grad-CAM technique was applied to create class-specific heatmap images in order to highlight the features extracted in the X-ray images. Various optimizers were used for error minimization purposes. DenseNet-121 outperformed the other three models in terms of both accuracy and prediction.

Indexed as

COVID-19Deep LearningArtificial IntelligenceHumansSARS-CoV-2X-Raysartificial intelligenceCNNCOVID-19transfer learningX-ray images

Identifiers

PMID34502702
PMCPMC8434081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.