ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
A Novel Unsupervised Machine Learning-Based Method for Chatter Detection in the Milling of Thin-Walled Parts.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using Feature Engineering and Principal Component Analysis for Monitoring Spindle Speed Change Based on Kullback-Leibler Divergence with a Gaussian Mixture Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Chatter Monitoring of Machining Center Using Head Stock Structural Vibration Analyzed with a 1D Convolutional Neural Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Gaussian Process State Space Model Fusion Physical Model and Residual Analysis for Fatigue Evaluation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Tool Condition Monitoring for High-Performance Machining Systems-A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Data-driven chatter detection techniques avoid complex physical modeling and provide the basis for industrial applications of cutting process monitoring. Among them, feature extraction is the key step of chatter detection, which can compensate for the accuracy disadvantage of machine learning algorithms to some extent if the extracted features are highly correlated with the milling condition. However, the classification accuracy of the current feature extraction methods is not satisfactory, and a combination of multiple features is required to identify the chatter. This limits the development of unsupervised machine learning algorithms for chattering detection, which further affects the application in practical processing. In this paper, the fractal feature of the signal is extracted by structure function method (SFM) for the first time, which solves the problem that the features are easily affected by process parameters. Milling chatter is identified based on k-means algorithm, which avoids the complex process of training model, and the judgment method of milling chatter is also discussed. The proposed method can achieve 94.4% identification accuracy by using only one single signal feature, which is better than other feature extraction methods, and even better than some supervised machine learning algorithms. Moreover, experiments show that chatter will affect the distribution of cutting bending moment, and it is not reliable to monitor tool wear through the polar plot of the bending moment. This provides a theoretical basis for the application of unsupervised machine learning algorithms in chatter detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.