Development of a New Submaximal Walk Test to Predict Maximal Oxygen Consumption in Healthy Adults.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Assessment of Exercise Intensity for Uphill Walking in Healthy Adults Performed Indoors and Outdoors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
   Article
2. Development and validation of a 1-km cardio-trekking test to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy adults.Preventive medicine reports · 2022
   Article
3. Oxygen Saturation Behavior by Pulse Oximetry in Female Athletes: Breaking Myths.Biosensors · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as