Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34502375›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Mammalian and Invertebrate Models as Complementary Tools for Gaining Mechanistic Insight on Muscle Responses to Spaceflight.

Thomas Cahill, Henry Cope, Joseph J Bass, Eliah G Overbey, Rachel Gilbert, Willian Abraham da Silveira, Amber M Paul, Tejaswini Mishra, Raúl Herranz, Sigrid S Reinsch and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dysfunctions, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic strategies of pancreatic β-cells in diabetes.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2023
    Review
  9. iScience · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Thomas CahillSchool of Biological Sciences & Institute for Global Food Security, Queens University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5DL, UK.
Henry CopeNottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2QL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4984-0567
Joseph J BassMRC-Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2QL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8236-681X
Eliah G OverbeyDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Rachel GilbertNASA Ames Research Center, Space Biosciences Division, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.
Willian Abraham da SilveiraSchool of Biological Sciences & Institute for Global Food Security, Queens University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5DL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6370-2884
Amber M PaulNASA Ames Research Center, Space Biosciences Division, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.
Tejaswini MishraDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA.
Raúl HerranzCentro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas-CSIC, Ramiro de Maeztu 9, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Sigrid S ReinschNASA Ames Research Center, Space Biosciences Division, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6484-7521
Sylvain V CostesNASA Ames Research Center, Space Biosciences Division, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8542-2389
Gary HardimanSchool of Biological Sciences & Institute for Global Food Security, Queens University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5DL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4558-0400
Nathaniel J SzewczykMRC-Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2QL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4425-9746
Candice G T TahimicNASA Ames Research Center, Space Biosciences Division, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.
Ames Research Center · USQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBCentro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas · ESStanford University · USUniversity of North Florida · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioinformatics approaches have proven useful in understanding biological responses to spaceflight. Spaceflight experiments remain resource intensive and rare. One outstanding issue is how to maximize scientific output from a limited number of omics datasets from traditional animal models including nematodes, fruitfly, and rodents. The utility of omics data from invertebrate models in anticipating mammalian responses to spaceflight has not been fully explored. Hence, we performed comparative analyses of transcriptomes of soleus and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) in mice that underwent 37 days of spaceflight. Results indicate shared stress responses and altered circadian rhythm. EDL showed more robust growth signals and

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCircadian RhythmDatabases, GeneticDrosophila melanogasterExtraterrestrial EnvironmentGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingHindlimb SuspensionMiceModels, AnimalMuscle, SkeletalMuscular AtrophySpace FlightStress, PhysiologicalTranscriptomeanimal modelsbedrestcross-species comparisonhindlimb unloadingmicrogravitymusclespaceflighttranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID34502375
PMCPMC8430797
OpenAlexW3198300152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.