Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34502287›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Step-by-Step Immune Activation for Suicide Gene Therapy Reinforcement.

Irina Alekseenko, Alexey Kuzmich, Liya Kondratyeva, Sofia Kondratieva, Victor Pleshkan, Eugene Sverdlov

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Host DNA repair factors empower a mechanism of antiviral nucleoside analog resistance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irina AlekseenkoInstitute of Molecular Genetics of National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute", 123182 Moscow, Russia.
Alexey KuzmichInstitute of Molecular Genetics of National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute", 123182 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3702-3524
Liya KondratyevaShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3990-8262
Sofia KondratievaShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Victor PleshkanInstitute of Molecular Genetics of National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute", 123182 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5456-5582
Eugene SverdlovInstitute of Molecular Genetics of National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute", 123182 Moscow, Russia.
Kurchatov Institute · RUInstitute of Bioorganic Chemistry · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene-directed enzyme prodrug gene therapy (GDEPT) theoretically represents a useful method to carry out chemotherapy for cancer with minimal side effects through the formation of a chemotherapeutic agent inside cancer cells. However, despite great efforts, promising preliminary results, and a long period of time (over 25 years) since the first mention of this method, GDEPT has not yet reached the clinic. There is a growing consensus that optimal cancer therapies should generate robust tumor-specific immune responses. The advent of checkpoint immunotherapy has yielded new highly promising avenues of study in cancer therapy. For such therapy, it seems reasonable to use combinations of different immunomodulators alongside traditional methods, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, as well as GDEPT. In this review, we focused on non-viral gene immunotherapy systems combining the intratumoral production of toxins diffused by GDEPT and immunomodulatory molecules. Special attention was paid to the applications and mechanisms of action of the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), a cytokine that is widely used but shows contradictory effects. Another method to enhance the formation of stable immune responses in a tumor, the use of danger signals, is also discussed. The process of dying from GDEPT cancer cells initiates danger signaling by releasing damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that exert immature dendritic cells by increasing antigen uptake, maturation, and antigen presentation to cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. We hypothesized that the combined action of this danger signal and GM-CSF issued from the same dying cancer cell within a limited space would focus on a limited pool of immature dendritic cells, thus acting synergistically and enhancing their maturation and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte attraction potential. We also discuss the problem of enhancing the cancer specificity of the combined GDEPT-GM-CSF-danger signal system by means of artificial cancer specific promoters or a modified delivery system.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesAnimalsCancer VaccinesGenes, Transgenic, SuicideGenetic TherapyGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsOncolytic VirotherapyProdrugsThymidine KinaseCancer VaccinesGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorProdrugssitimagene ceradenovecThymidine KinasecancerGM–CSFimmunosuppressionimmunotherapysuicide gene therapytumor

Identifiers

PMID34502287
PMCPMC8430744
OpenAlexW3196385215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.