Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34502160›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Machine Learning-Based Radiomics Signatures for EGFR and KRAS Mutations Prediction in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le, Quang Hien Kha, Van Hiep Nguyen, Yung-Chieh Chen, Sho-Jen Cheng, Cheng-Yu Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Radiogenomics-based prediction ofZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nguyen Quoc Khanh LeProfessional Master Program in Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4896-7926
Quang Hien KhaInternational Master/Ph.D. Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.
Van Hiep NguyenInternational Master/Ph.D. Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3390-7923
Yung-Chieh ChenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Sho-Jen ChengDepartment of Medical Imaging, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Cheng-Yu ChenProfessional Master Program in Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0428-4373

Funding

Ministry of Education DP2-110-21121-01-A-06Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 109-2321-B-038-004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early identification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations is crucial for selecting a therapeutic strategy for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We proposed a machine learning-based model for feature selection and prediction of EGFR and KRAS mutations in patients with NSCLC by including the least number of the most semantic radiomics features. We included a cohort of 161 patients from 211 patients with NSCLC from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) and analyzed 161 low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) images for detecting EGFR and KRAS mutations. A total of 851 radiomics features, which were classified into 9 categories, were obtained through manual segmentation and radiomics feature extraction from LDCT. We evaluated our models using a validation set consisting of 18 patients derived from the same TCIA dataset. The results showed that the genetic algorithm plus XGBoost classifier exhibited the most favorable performance, with an accuracy of 0.836 and 0.86 for detecting EGFR and KRAS mutations, respectively. We demonstrated that a noninvasive machine learning-based model including the least number of the most semantic radiomics signatures could robustly predict EGFR and KRAS mutations in patients with NSCLC.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMutationAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsBiomarkersCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Reproducibility of ResultsBiomarkersEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)EGFR mutationeXtreme Gradient Boostingfeature selectiongenetic algorithmKRAS mutationlow-dose computed tomographymachine learningnon-small-cell lung carcinomaradiogenomics

Identifiers

PMID34502160
PMCPMC8431041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.