Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34502124›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Bioactivity and Antibacterial Behaviors of Nanostructured Lithium-Doped Hydroxyapatite for Bone Scaffold Application.

Pardis Keikhosravani, Hossein Maleki-Ghaleh, Amir Kahaie Khosrowshahi, Mahdi Bodaghi, Ziba Dargahi, Majid Kavanlouei, Pooriya Khademi-Azandehi, Ali Fallah, Younes Beygi-Khosrowshahi, M Hossein Siadati

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Biodegradable Magnesium Biomaterials-Road to the Clinic.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Pardis KeikhosravaniDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran P.O. Box 19919-43344, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0296-0091
Hossein Maleki-GhalehDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran P.O. Box 19919-43344, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-2020-6025
Amir Kahaie KhosrowshahiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz P.O. Box 51335-1996, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-0944-5554
Mahdi BodaghiDepartment of Engineering, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0707-944X
Ziba DargahiDepartment of Materials Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 51368, Iran.
Majid KavanloueiMaterials Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia P.O. Box 57561-51818, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-2385-6798
Pooriya Khademi-AzandehiResearch Center for Advanced Materials, Faculty of Materials Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz P.O. Box 51335-1996, Iran.
Ali FallahFaculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabanci University, Istanbul 34956, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7744-4246
Younes Beygi-KhosrowshahiChemical Engineering Group, Faculty of Engineering, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz P.O. Box 53751-71379, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-0102-4229
M Hossein SiadatiDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran P.O. Box 19919-43344, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-2347-1246
Sahand University of Technology · IRAzarbaijan Shahid Madani University · IRK.N.Toosi University of Technology · IRNottingham Trent University · GBSabancı Üniversitesi · TRTabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Tabriz · IRUrmia University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The material for bone scaffold replacement should be biocompatible and antibacterial to prevent scaffold-associated infection. We biofunctionalized the hydroxyapatite (HA) properties by doping it with lithium (Li). The HA and 4 Li-doped HA (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 wt.%) samples were investigated to find the most suitable Li content for both aspects. The synthesized nanoparticles, by the mechanical alloying method, were cold-pressed uniaxially and then sintered for 2 h at 1250 °C. Characterization using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) revealed particle sizes in the range of 60 to 120 nm. The XRD analysis proved the formation of HA and Li-doped HA nanoparticles with crystal sizes ranging from 59 to 89 nm. The bioactivity of samples was investigated in simulated body fluid (SBF), and the growth of apatite formed on surfaces was evaluated using SEM and EDS. Cellular behavior was estimated by MG63 osteoblast-like cells. The results of apatite growth and cell analysis showed that 1.0 wt.% Li doping was optimal to maximize the bioactivity of HA. Antibacterial characteristics against Escherichia coli (

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsTissue ScaffoldsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone RegenerationDurapatiteLithiumSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredStructure-Activity RelationshipTissue EngineeringX-Ray DiffractionAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsDurapatiteLithiumantibacterialbioactivityhydroxyapatiteLi dopingmechanical alloying

Identifiers

PMID34502124
PMCPMC8430817
OpenAlexW3194500216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.