Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34502038›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Optimization of Blood Handling and Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Cryopreservation of Low Cell Number Samples.

Christopher M Hope, Dao Huynh, Ying Ying Wong, Helena Oakey, Griffith Boord Perkins, Trung Nguyen, Sabrina Binkowski, Minh Bui, Ace Y L Choo, Emily Gibson and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Fluid-Squid: DIY Multiplexed Imaging of Cells and Tissues.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher M HopeRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Dao HuynhRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Ying Ying WongRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Helena OakeyRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1057-7615
Griffith Boord PerkinsRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Trung NguyenRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Sabrina BinkowskiChildren's Diabetes Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4435-472X
Minh BuiChild Health Research Unit, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Ace Y L ChooChildren's Diabetes Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
Emily GibsonSchool of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Dexing HuangWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia.
Ki Wook KimSchool of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9579-6408
Katrina NguiWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia.
William D RawlinsonSchool of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0988-7827
Timothy SadlonRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Jennifer J CouperRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Megan A S PennoRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9617-0826
Simon C BarryRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
On Behalf Of The Endia Study Group
The University of Adelaide · AUWomen's and Children's Hospital · AUNew South Wales Department of Health · AUThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AUWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AUBarwon Health · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRural/remote blood collection can cause delays in processing, reducing PBMC number, viability, cell composition and function. To mitigate these impacts, blood was stored at 4 °C prior to processing. Viable cell number, viability, immune phenotype, and Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) release were measured. Furthermore, the lowest protective volume of cryopreservation media and cell concentration was investigated.

methodsBlood from 10 individuals was stored for up to 10 days. Flow cytometry and IFN-γ ELISPOT were used to measure immune phenotype and function on thawed PBMC. Additionally, PBMC were cryopreserved in volumes ranging from 500 µL to 25 µL and concentration from 10 × 10

resultsPBMC viability and viable cell number significantly reduced over time compared with samples processed immediately, except when stored for 24 h at RT. Monocytes and NK cells significantly reduced over time regardless of storage temperature. Samples with >24 h of RT storage had an increased proportion in Low-Density Neutrophils and T cells compared with samples stored at 4 °C. IFN-γ release was reduced after 24 h of storage, however not in samples stored at 4 °C for >24 h. The lowest protective volume identified was 150 µL with the lowest density of 6.67 × 10

conclusionA sample delay of 24 h at RT does not impact the viability and total viable cell numbers. When long-term delays exist (>4 d) total viable cell number and cell viability losses are reduced in samples stored at 4 °C. Immune phenotype and function are slightly altered after 24 h of storage, further impacts of storage are reduced in samples stored at 4 °C.

Indexed as

AdultBlood PreservationCryopreservationHumansImmunophenotypingInterferon-gammaMonocytesInterferon-gammablood handlingcell concentrationcryopreservationdelay in processingPBMC

Identifiers

PMID34502038
PMCPMC8431655
OpenAlexW3193920772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.