Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34501847›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Challenges in Preventive Practices and Risk Communication towards COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study in Bangladesh.

Farah Naz Rahman, Md Al Amin Bhuiyan, Kabir Hossen, Hafiz T A Khan, Akm Fazlur Rahman, Koustuv Dalal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Optimizing infectious disease mitigation under dynamic conditions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Farah Naz RahmanOffice of the Executive Director, Centre for Injury Prevention and Research Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka 1206, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-2265-2742
Md Al Amin BhuiyanOffice of the Executive Director, Centre for Injury Prevention and Research Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka 1206, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-7385-0864
Kabir HossenOffice of the Executive Director, Centre for Injury Prevention and Research Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka 1206, Bangladesh.
Hafiz T A KhanCollege of Nursing, Midwifery and Healthcare, University of West London, London W5 5RF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1817-3730
Akm Fazlur RahmanOffice of the Executive Director, Centre for Injury Prevention and Research Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka 1206, Bangladesh.
Koustuv DalalDivision of Public Health Science, School of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, 851 70 Sundsvall, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7393-796X
Directorate General of Health Services · BDMid Sweden University · SEUniversity of West London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bangladesh recently experienced a COVID-19 second wave, resulting in the highest number of new cases and deaths in a single day. This study aims to identify the challenges for COVID-19 preventive practices and risk communications and associated factors among Bangladeshi adults. A cross-sectional survey was conducted between December 2020 and January 2021 involving 1382 Bangladeshi adults (aged ≥ 18-years) in randomly selected urban and rural areas from all eight divisions in Bangladesh. Descriptive data analysis was conducted to highlight the challenges for preventive practices and risk communications for COVID-19. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the sociodemographic groups vulnerable to these challenges. Lack of availability of protective equipment (44.4%), crowded living situations/workspaces (36.8%), inadequate information on the proper use of protective measures (21.9%), inadequate handwashing and sanitation facilities (17.6%), and negative influences on family/friends (17.4%) were identified as barriers to COVID-19 preventive practices. It was also found that males (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.01, 1.7), rural residents (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.2, 2), respondents with a low level of education: no schooling vs. ≥higher secondary (OR = 3.5, 95% CI = 2.3, 5.2), primary vs. ≥higher secondary (OR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.7, 3.8), respondents engaged in agricultural (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.2, 2.4), laboring (OR = 3.2, 95% CI = 2, 5), and domestic works (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.07, 2.5), and people with disabilities (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.1, 2.6) were all likely to have difficulty in practicing effective COVID-19 protective behaviors. Respondents' education and occupation were significant predictors of inadequate understanding of COVID-19 risk communications and was identified as a problem among 17.4% of the respondents. A substantial percentage of Bangladeshi adults have difficulty practising COVID-19 protective behaviours and have poor comprehension of risk communications, particularly in rural areas and among those with low education. This research can aid policymakers in developing tailored COVID-19 risk communications and mitigation strategies to help prevent future waves of the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultBangladeshCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMaleSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesBangladeshCOVID-19pandemicprotective behaviorrisk communication

Identifiers

PMID34501847
PMCPMC8430532
OpenAlexW3190132238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.