Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34501816›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Which Biomass Stove(s) Capable of Reducing Household Air Pollution Are Available to the Poorest Communities Globally?

Debbi Stanistreet, Eunice Phillip, Nitya Kumar, Rachel Anderson de Cuevas, Megan Davis, Jessica Langevin, Vincent Jumbe, Aisling Walsh, Sarah Jewitt, Mike Clifford

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Debbi StanistreetDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, Royal College of Surgeons University of Medicine and Health Sciences, D02DH60 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3738-1727
Eunice PhillipDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, Royal College of Surgeons University of Medicine and Health Sciences, D02DH60 Dublin, Ireland.
Nitya KumarDepartment of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Manama 15503, Bahrain.ORCID 0000-0001-7391-3730
Rachel Anderson de CuevasDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GF, UK.
Megan DavisDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, Royal College of Surgeons University of Medicine and Health Sciences, D02DH60 Dublin, Ireland.
Jessica LangevinDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, Royal College of Surgeons University of Medicine and Health Sciences, D02DH60 Dublin, Ireland.
Vincent JumbeDepartment of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi, Blantyre 560001, Malawi.
Aisling WalshDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, Royal College of Surgeons University of Medicine and Health Sciences, D02DH60 Dublin, Ireland.
Sarah JewittSchool of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7159-0621
Mike CliffordFaculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6379-2672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, household and ambient air pollution (HAAP) leads to approximately seven million premature deaths per year. One of the main sources of household air pollution (HAP) is the traditional stove. So-called improved cookstoves (ICS) do not reduce emissions to levels that benefit health, but the poorest communities are unlikely to have access to cleaner cooking in the medium term. Therefore, ICS are being promoted as an intermediate step. This paper summarises the current evidence on the ICS available to the global poorest, utilising data from the Clean Cookstoves Catalog and systematic review evidence from the field. The cheapest stoves offer little reduction in HAP. Only one ICS, available at US$5 or less, (the canarumwe) minimally reduced pollutants based on ISO testing standards and no studies included in the systematic reviews reported tested this stove in the field. We recommend field testing all ICS as standard, and clear information on stove characteristics, sustainability, safety, emissions efficiency, in-field performance, affordability, availability in different settings, and the ability of the stove to meet community cooking needs. In addition, ICS should be promoted alongside a suite of measures, including improved ventilation and facilities to dry wood, to further reduce the pollutant levels.

Indexed as

Air PollutionAir Pollution, IndoorHousehold ArticlesBiomassCookingParticulate MatterParticulate Matterclean fuel accessglobal pooresthousehold air pollutionimproved cookstovesSDG 7

Identifiers

PMID34501816
PMCPMC8430932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.