Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34501782›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Predictors of Occupational Burnout: A Systematic Review.

Yara Shoman, Emna El May, Sandy Carla Marca, Pascal Wild, Renzo Bianchi, Merete Drevvatne Bugge, Cigdem Caglayan, Dimitru Cheptea, Marco Gnesi, Lode Godderis and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
18.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Determinants of Burnout among Teachers: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Occupational Stress in the Neuroticism-Burnout Link: An Exploratory Examination of Physiological Contributions.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Enhancing Laboratory Animal Welfare through Motivational Training of Facility Personnel: A One Welfare Approach.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Psychometric Properties of the Areas of Worklife Survey in an Industrial Context in Thailand.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 11 countries.

Yara ShomanCenter of Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1066 Epalinges-Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5331-4535
Emna El MayCenter of Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1066 Epalinges-Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sandy Carla MarcaCenter of Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1066 Epalinges-Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pascal WildCenter of Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1066 Epalinges-Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3165-3808
Renzo BianchiInstitute of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Neuchâtel, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2336-0407
Merete Drevvatne BuggeNational Institute of Occupational Health (STAMI), 0363 Oslo, Norway.
Cigdem CaglayanDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, İzmit 41001, Turkey.
Dimitru ChepteaFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 2004 Chisinau, Moldova.ORCID 0000-0002-2229-0286
Marco GnesiDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Lode GodderisDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4764-8835
Sibel KiranInstitute of Public Health, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06800, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4191-113X
Damien M McElvennyInstitute of Occupational Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9WU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0953-8336
Zakia MediouniCenter of Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1066 Epalinges-Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ingrid Sivesind MehlumNational Institute of Occupational Health (STAMI), 0363 Oslo, Norway.
Dragan MijakoskiInstitute of Occupational Health of RNM, WHO Collaborating Center, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia.ORCID 0000-0002-3291-0661
Jordan MinovInstitute of Occupational Health of RNM, WHO Collaborating Center, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia.
Henk F van der MolenCenter for Occupational Diseases, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0719-2020
Evangelia NenaMedical School, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0381-4715
Marina OteleaClinical Department 5, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0829-0562
Irina Guseva CanuCenter of Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1066 Epalinges-Lausanne, Switzerland.
Centre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne · CHInstitute of public health of Republic of Macedonia · MKNational Institute of Occupational Health · NOAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RODemocritus University of Thrace · GRHacettepe University · TRKocaeli Üniversitesi · TRKU Leuven · BENicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy · MDUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Neuchâtel · CHUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to review occupational burnout predictors, considering their type, effect size and role (protective versus harmful), and the overall evidence of their importance. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase were searched from January 1990 to August 2018 for longitudinal studies examining any predictor of occupational burnout among workers. We arranged predictors in four families and 13 subfamilies of homogenous constructs. The plots of z-scores per predictor type enabled graphical discrimination of the effects. The vote-counting and binomial test enabled discrimination of the effect direction. The size of the effect was estimated using Cohen's formula. The risk of bias and the overall evidence were assessed using the MEVORECH and GRADE methods, respectively. Eighty-five studies examining 261 predictors were included. We found a moderate quality of evidence for the harmful effects of the job demands subfamily (six predictors), and negative job attitudes, with effect sizes from small to medium. We also found a moderate quality of evidence for the protective effect of adaptive coping (small effect sizes) and leisure (small to medium effect sizes). Preventive interventions for occupational burnout might benefit from intervening on the established predictors regarding reducing job demands and negative job attitudes and promoting adaptive coping and leisure.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalAdaptation, PsychologicalHumansJob SatisfactionLongitudinal Studiesburnoutetiologyexhaustionoccupational healthprevention

Identifiers

PMID34501782
PMCPMC8430894
OpenAlexW3196889901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.