Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34501751›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Systematic Review on Mentalization as Key Factor in Psychotherapy.

Jonas Lüdemann, Sven Rabung, Sylke Andreas

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonas LüdemannInstitute of Psychology, University of Klagenfurt, Universitätsstr. 65-67, 9020 Klagenfurt am Woerthersee, Austria.
Sven RabungInstitute of Psychology, University of Klagenfurt, Universitätsstr. 65-67, 9020 Klagenfurt am Woerthersee, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5883-3070
Sylke AndreasInstitute of Psychology, University of Klagenfurt, Universitätsstr. 65-67, 9020 Klagenfurt am Woerthersee, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1060-1411

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMentalization processes seem to be of high relevance for social learning and seem important in all psychotherapies. The exact role of mentalization processes in psychotherapy is still unknown. The aim of the present systematic review is to investigate whether mentalization is related to the therapeutic outcome and, if so, whether it has a moderating, mediative, or predictive function.

methodA systematic review with an electronic database search was conducted. A total of 2567 records were identified, and 10 studies were included in the final synthesis.

resultsPsychotherapy research is still in an initial phase of examining and understanding the impact of mentalization on psychotherapy outcome. The small number of studies and the executed study designs and statistical analyses indicate the possible role that mentalization has in psychotherapy.

conclusionGenerally, strongly elaborated study designs are needed to identify the role of mentalization in psychotherapy. Mentalization seems to be differently represented in differential treatment approaches. Nevertheless, it should be noted that the patient's mentalizing capacity seems to be relevant to the psychotherapy process. Psychotherapies should be adapted to this.

Indexed as

MentalizationHumansPsychotherapymentalizationoutcomepsychotherapyreflective functioningsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34501751
PMCPMC8431324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.