Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34501738›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Tocilizumab Therapy versus Standard of Care in over 15,000 COVID-19 Pneumonia Patients during the First Eight Months of the Pandemic.

Naim Mahroum, Abdulla Watad, Charlie Bridgewood, Muhammad Mansour, Ahmad Nasr, Amr Hussein, Rola Khamisy-Farah, Raymond Farah, Omer Gendelman, Merav Lidar and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The Role of Exposomes in the Pathophysiology of Autoimmune Diseases II: Pathogens.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Naim MahroumZabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Department of Medicine B., Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 5265601, Israel.
Abdulla WatadZabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Department of Medicine B., Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 5265601, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-1404-8027
Charlie BridgewoodLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM), University of Leeds, Leeds LS7 4SA, UK.
Muhammad MansourDepartment of Surgery A, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya 2210001, Israel.
Ahmad NasrDepartment of Pathology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.
Amr HusseinMedical Faculty, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1577-774X
Rola Khamisy-FarahClalit Health Service, Akko, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed 13100, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-6259-222X
Raymond FarahDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ziv Medical Center, Safed 13100, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9777-5106
Omer GendelmanZabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Department of Medicine B., Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 5265601, Israel.
Merav LidarSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-5800-7860
Yehuda ShoenfeldZabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Department of Medicine B., Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 5265601, Israel.
Howard AmitalZabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Department of Medicine B., Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 5265601, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-5406-7716
Jude Dzevela KongLaboratory for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (LIAM), Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7557-5672
Jianhong WuLaboratory for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (LIAM), Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.
Nicola Luigi BragazziLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM), University of Leeds, Leeds LS7 4SA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8409-868X
Dennis McGonagleLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM), University of Leeds, Leeds LS7 4SA, UK.
Tel Aviv University · ILUniversity of Leeds · GBYork University · CABar-Ilan University · ILOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITRebecca Sieff Hospital · ILSt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTocilizumab is an anti-IL-6 therapy widely adopted in the management of the so-called "cytokine storm" related to SARS-CoV-2 virus infection, but its effectiveness, use in relation to concomitant corticosteroid therapy and safety were unproven despite widespread use in numerous studies, mostly open label at the start of the pandemic.

methodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies utilising tocilizumab in COVID-19 on different databases (PubMed/MEDLINE/Scopus) and preprint servers (medRxiv and SSRN) from inception until 20 July 2020 (PROSPERO CRD42020195690). Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were performed. The impact of tocilizumab and concomitant corticosteroid therapy or tocilizumab alone versus standard of care (SOC) on the death rate, need for mechanical ventilation, ICU admission and bacterial infections were assessed.

resultsThirty-nine studies with 15,531 patients (3657 cases versus 11,874 controls) were identified. Unadjusted estimates (

conclusionDespite the heterogeneity of included studies and large number of preprint articles, our findings from the first eight of the pandemic in over 15,000 COVID-19 cases suggested an incremental efficacy of tocilizumab in severe COVID-19 that were confirmed by subsequent meta-analyses of large randomized trials of tocilizumab. This suggests that analysis of case-control studies and pre-print server data in the early stages of a pandemic appeared robust for supporting incremental benefits and lack of major therapeutic toxicity of tocilizumab for severe COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentPandemicsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansSARS-CoV-2Standard of CareTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedtocilizumabCOVID-19systematic review and meta-analysistocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID34501738
PMCPMC8431489
OpenAlexW3198694451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.