ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021
Health Effects Related to Wind Turbine Sound: An Update.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Determinants of natural adult sleep: An umbrella review.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Resting state network changes induced by experimental inaudible infrasound exposure and associations with self-reported noise sensitivity and annoyance.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Mapping renewable energy futures in the Cologne planning region: Land-use constraints and landscape impacts.Environmental management · 2026Article
- Should limit values be set for infrasound caused by wind turbines?International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2025Review
- Tackling noise pollution in climate adaptation and mitigation: planetary health benefits towards a net-zero future.Oxford open climate change · 2025Article
- Health position paper and redox perspectives - Disease burden by transportation noise.Redox biology · 2024Review
- Wind energy and insects: reviewing the state of knowledge and identifying potential interactions.PeerJ · 2024Review
- Evaluation of Low-Frequency Noise, Infrasound, and Health Symptoms at an Administrative Building and Men's Shelter: A Case Study.Seminars in hearing · 2023Review
- Unheard, Unfelt? Researchers Find No Evidence of Effects from Wind Turbine Infrasound.Environmental health perspectives · 2023Article
- Quantification of Sound Exposure from Wind Turbines in France.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Article
- Review
- Population Annoyance by Below-Limit Industrial Noise from the Mining Industry: A Questionnaire Survey Methodology.Noise & healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Commissioned by the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment, an update of an earlier narrative review was prepared for the literature published between 2017 and mid-2020 about the effects of wind turbine sound on the health of local residents. Specific attention was hereby given to the health effects of low-frequency sound and infrasound. The Netherlands Institute for Public Health and the Environment and Mundonovo sound research collected the scientific literature on the effect of wind turbines on annoyance, sleep disturbance, cardiovascular disease, and metabolic effects, as well as mental and cognitive impacts. It also investigated what is known about annoyance from visual aspects of wind turbines and other non-acoustic factors, such as the local decision-making process. From the literature study, annoyance again came forward as the most important consequence of sound: the louder the sound (in dB) of wind turbines, the stronger the annoyance response was. The literature did not show that "low-frequency sound" (sound with a low pitch) results in extra annoyance on top of normal sound. Results of scientific research for other health effects are either not available or inconsistent, and we can conclude that a clear association with wind turbine related sound levels cannot be confirmed. There is evidence that long-term effects are related to the annoyance people experience. These results confirm earlier conclusions. There is increasing evidence that annoyance is lower when people can participate in the siting process. Worries of residents should be addressed in an early stage, by involving them in the process of planning and decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.