ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021
An Analysis of the Impact of the Emissions Trading System on the Green Total Factor Productivity Based on the Spatial Difference-in-Differences Approach: The Case of China.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trading our way to a greener future: how environmental rights trading reduces urban carbon emissions in China-empirical analysis based on China's emission rights trading.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024Article
- Quantifying the Effectiveness of Environmental Regulations on Green Total Factor Productivity: Evidence Based on China's Environmental Protection Interview Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Environmental cooperation system, ESG performance and corporate green innovation: Empirical evidence from China.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- The effect of mandatory environmental regulation on green development efficiency: evidence from China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023Article
- The Impact of SOInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Environmental Impact Assessment by Green Processes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Analysis on the Spatio-Temporal Evolution Characteristics of the Impact of China's Digitalization Process on Green Total Factor Productivity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Measuring the Demand Connectedness among China's Regional Carbon Markets.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- The Role of Government Innovation Support in the Process of Urban Green Sustainable Development: A Spatial Difference-in-Difference Analysis Based on China's Innovative City Pilot Policy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Can the Carbon Emissions Trading System Improve the Green Total Factor Productivity of the Pilot Cities?-A Spatial Difference-in-Differences Econometric Analysis in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- How Do Chinese National Scenic Areas Affect Tourism Economic Development? The Moderating Effect of Time-Limited Rectification.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How to effectively identify the spatial effect of the emissions trading system(ETS) on urban green total factor productivity(GTFP) generated through the linkage of economic factors between cities is a necessary part of scientifically evaluating the effect of ETS policy in emerging- market countries. This study aims to examine the spatial effect, mechanism, and heterogeneity of the ETS on urban GTFP based on the panel data of 281 cities from 2004 to 2017 in China, applying spatial difference-in-differences(DID) Durbin model (SDID-SDM) with multidimensional fixed effect (FE). The results show that ETS significantly improves the GTFP of the pilot cities, produces a spatial spillover effect and the results are robust to the placebo test, propensity score matching SDID (PSM-SDID) test, and Carbon-ETS interference test. Further analysis shows that the policy effect is mainly driven by improving energy efficiency, promoting green innovation, and optimizing the industrial structure. In addition, we found that ETS performs better in regions with a high degree of marketization, strong environmental law enforcement, and a low proportion of coal consumption. In general, the identification method of this study can be used as a scientific reference for conducting similar research in other emerging countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.