Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34501624›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Primary Care Professionals' Self-Efficacy Surrounding Advance Care Planning and Its Link to Sociodemographics, Background and Perceptions: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Cristina Lasmarías, Amor Aradilla-Herrero, Cristina Esquinas, Sebastià Santaeugènia, Francisco Cegri, Esther Limón, Mireia Subirana-Casacuberta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Complex advance care planning intervention in general practice (ACP-GP): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Perceptions and experiences of onco-haematology professionals in relation to advance care planning: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Cristina LasmaríasDepartment of Education and Training, Catalan Institute of Oncology, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5679-2962
Amor Aradilla-HerreroSchool of Nursing, Escoles Universitàries Gimbernat (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), 08174 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1916-2803
Cristina EsquinasDepartment of Pneumology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, 08031 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5568-257X
Sebastià SantaeugèniaCatalonia Chronic Care Research Group, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, 08500 Vic, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2725-4065
Francisco CegriResponsible for Strategy and Innovation of the Association of Family and Community Nursing of Catalonia (AIFiCC), 08001 Barcelona, Spain.
Esther LimónPermanent Board of the Catalan Society of Family and Community Medicine (CAMFiC), 08019 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3530-3960
Mireia Subirana-CasacubertaNursing Department, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc TaulíI3PT, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Consorci Sanitari Parc Taulí, 08208 Sabadell, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1577-4159
Universitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya · ESCatalan Society of Family and Community Medicine · ESInstitut Català de la Salut · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary care (PC) professionals have been considered the most appropriate practitioners for leading Advance care planning (ACP) processes with advanced chronic patients.

aimTo explore how PC doctors' and nurses' self-efficacy surrounding ACP is linked to their sociodemographic characteristics, background and perceptions of ACP practices.

methodsA cross-sectional study was performed. Sociodemographics, background and perceptions about ACP in practice were collected using an online survey. The Advance Care Planning Self-Efficacy Spanish (ACP-SEs) scale was used for the self-efficacy measurement. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Bivariate, multivariate and backward stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed to identify variables independently related to a higher score on the ACP-SEs.

resultsN = 465 participants, 70.04% doctors, 81.47% female. The participants had a mean age of 46.45 years and 66.16% had spent >15 years in their current practice. The logistic regression model showed that scoring ≤ 75 on the ACP-SEs was related to a higher score on feeling sufficiently trained, having participated in ACP processes, perceiving that ACP facilitates knowledge of preferences and values, and perceiving that ACP improves patients' quality of life.

conclusionProfessionals with previous background and those who have a positive perception of ACP are more likely to feel able to carry out ACP processes with patients.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningSelf EfficacyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionPrimary Health CareQuality of Lifeadvance care planningprimary careself-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID34501624
PMCPMC8430566
OpenAlexW3197096892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.