Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34501566›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Workplace Well-Being and Intent to Stay by Health Care Workers Reassigned during the First COVID-19 Wave: Results of a Swiss Survey.

Ingrid Gilles, Cédric Mabire, Margaux Perriraz, Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Empowering Patients and Supporting Health Care Providers-New Avenues for High Quality Care and Safety.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ingrid GillesCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2051-4749
Cédric MabireInstitute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2666-8300
Margaux PerrirazCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Isabelle Peytremann-BridevauxCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Centre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our study aimed at investigating the way not having the choice to be reassigned was associated to a poorer experience of reassignment among health care workers (HCWs) during the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and indirectly to a lower workplace well-being and reduced intent to stay at the hospital. We also investigated the moderating role of the perceived hospital management responsiveness on these associations. A cross sectional survey was sent to all professionals from 11 hospitals and clinics in the French-speaking part of Switzerland, in July 2020. Out of 2811 professionals who completed the survey, 436 were HCWs reassigned to COVID-19 units during the first wave of the pandemic and constituted our analysis sample. Results indicated that hospital management responsiveness moderated the association between lack of choice and reassignment experience, indicating that the more HCWs perceived responsiveness, the less the lack of choice affected their experience of reassignment and thus their intent to stay and workplace well-being. Lack of choice during reassignments can reduce intent to stay and workplace well-being, in particular if hospital management is not perceived to be responsive during the crisis. Attempts by hospital management to find solutions, such as flexibility in working hours or extraordinary leaves, can alleviate the perceived constraints of reassignment and be considered signs of responsiveness from hospital management.

Indexed as

COVID-19WorkplaceCross-Sectional StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansSARS-CoV-2SwitzerlandCOVID-19healthcare professionalsintent to staypandemicreassignmentwell-being

Identifiers

PMID34501566
PMCPMC8431054
OpenAlexW3197732890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.