ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021
A Complete Digital Workflow for Planning, Simulation, and Evaluation in Orthognathic Surgery.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Three-Dimensional Changes in Natural Head Position After Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: A Laser-Based Facial Scan Superimposition Study in Skeletal Class II and Class III Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- In-house digital workflow for virtual surgical planning and guide fabrication in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with genioplasty: A technical case report.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Clinical Accuracy and Postoperative Stability of 3D-Printed Surgical Guides in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: A Prospective Evaluation.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Skeletal deformities and surgical procedures in orthognathic surgery patients: a 10-Year retrospective analysis of 1095 cases.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Innovations in gender affirmation: AI-enhanced surgical guides for mandibular facial feminization surgery.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Predictive 3D Modeling of Orthognathic Surgery Outcomes Using Machine Learning Algorithms: A Systematic Review :.Galen medical journal · 2025Review
- Review
- Honoring Professor Hugo Lorenz Obwegeser: A Visionary in Maxillofacial Surgery and Orthodontics.Cureus · 2024Review
- [Comparison of the virtual surgical planning position of maxilla and condyle with the postoperative real position in patients with mandibular protrusion].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2024Article
- 3D printing materials and 3D printed surgical devices in oral and maxillofacial surgery: design, workflow and effectiveness.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Review
- Role of Three-Dimensional Printing in Treatment Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2023Review
- Effect of offset on the precision of 3D-printed orthognathic surgical splints.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- Effect of occlusal coverage depths on the precision of 3D-printed orthognathic surgical splints.BMC oral health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a complete digital workflow for planning, simulation, and evaluation for orthognathic surgery based on 3D digital natural head position reproduction, a cloud-based collaboration platform, and 3D landmark-based evaluation. We included 24 patients who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Surgeons and engineers could share the massive image data immediately and conveniently and collaborate closely in surgical planning and simulation using a cloud-based platform. The digital surgical splint could be optimized for a specific patient before or after the physical fabrication of 3D printing splints through close collaboration. The surgical accuracy was evaluated comprehensively via the translational (linear) and rotational (angular) discrepancies between identical 3D landmarks on the simulation and postoperative computed tomography (CT) models. The means of the absolute linear discrepancy at eight tooth landmarks were 0.61 ± 0.55, 0.86 ± 0.68, and 1.00 ± 0.79 mm in left-right, advance-setback, and impaction-elongation directions, respectively, and 1.67 mm in the root mean square direction. The linear discrepancy in the left-right direction was significantly different from the other two directions as shown by analysis of variance (ANOVA,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.