Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34501431›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Comparative Analysis of Stress and Deformation between One-Fenced and Three-Fenced Dental Implants Using Finite Element Analysis.

Chia-Hsuan Lee, Arvind Mukundan, Szu-Chien Chang, Yin-Lai Wang, Shu-Hao Lu, Yu-Cheng Huang, Hsiang-Chen Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chia-Hsuan LeeDepartment of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, 2, Zhongzheng 1st. Rd., Kaohsiung City 80284, Taiwan.
Arvind MukundanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Advanced Institute of Manufacturing with High Tech Innovations (AIM-HI), and Center for Innovative Research on Aging Society (CIRAS), National Chung Cheng University, 168, University Rd., Min Hsiung, Chiayi 62102, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7741-3722
Szu-Chien ChangDepartment of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, 2, Zhongzheng 1st. Rd., Kaohsiung City 80284, Taiwan.
Yin-Lai WangGentle Dental Clinic, No. 400, Baotai Rd., Fengshan Dist., Kaohsiung City 80284, Taiwan.
Shu-Hao LuTopology Medical Consultant Co., 12F., No. 812, Xinsheng Rd., Qianzhen Dist., Kaohsiung City 80284, Taiwan.
Yu-Cheng HuangDepartment of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, 2, Zhongzheng 1st. Rd., Kaohsiung City 80284, Taiwan.
Hsiang-Chen WangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Advanced Institute of Manufacturing with High Tech Innovations (AIM-HI), and Center for Innovative Research on Aging Society (CIRAS), National Chung Cheng University, 168, University Rd., Min Hsiung, Chiayi 62102, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4107-2062
Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital · TWNational Chung Cheng University · TW

Funding

Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital 109-022Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 108-2823-8-194-002, 109-2622-8-194-001-TE1, and 109-2622-8-194- 007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Finite element analysis (FEA) has always been an important tool in studying the influences of stress and deformation due to various loads on implants to the surrounding jaws. This study assessed the influence of two different types of dental implant model on stress dissipation in adjoining jaws and on the implant itself by utilizing FEA. This analysis aimed to examine the effects of increasing the number of fences along the implant and to compare the resulting stress distribution and deformation with surrounding bones. When a vertical force of 100 N was applied, the largest displacements found in the three-fenced and single-fenced models were 1.7469 and 2.5267, respectively, showing a drop of 30.8623%. The maximum stress found in the three-fenced and one-fenced models was 13.518 and 22.365 MPa, respectively, showing a drop of 39.557%. Moreover, when an oblique force at 35° was applied, a significant increase in deformation and stress was observed. However, the three-fenced model still had less stress and deformation compared with the single-fenced model. The FEA results suggested that as the number of fences increases, the stress dissipation increases, whereas deformation decreases considerably.

Indexed as

All-on-4cancellous bonecortical bonefinite element analysisstatic structural deformationvon mises stress

Identifiers

PMID34501431
PMCPMC8432445
OpenAlexW3198173103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.