Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34501334›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Is Single Gloving Still Acceptable? Investigation and Evaluation of Damages on Sterile Latex Gloves in General Surgery.

Andreas Enz, Imad Kamaleddine, Justus Groß, Clemens Schafmayer, Emad Alwafai, Larissa Sievers, Wolfram Mittelmeier, Annett Klinder

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Knot tying in arthroplasty and arthroscopy causes lesions to surgical gloves: a potential risk of infection.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andreas EnzOrthopaedic Clinic and Policlinic, University Medical Centre Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9258-487X
Imad KamaleddineDepartment of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Surgical Clinic and Polyclinic of University Medical Centre Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Justus GroßDepartment of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Surgical Clinic and Polyclinic of University Medical Centre Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Clemens SchafmayerDepartment of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Surgical Clinic and Polyclinic of University Medical Centre Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Emad AlwafaiDepartment of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Surgical Clinic and Polyclinic of University Medical Centre Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Larissa SieversOrthopaedic Clinic and Policlinic, University Medical Centre Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Wolfram MittelmeierOrthopaedic Clinic and Policlinic, University Medical Centre Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Annett KlinderOrthopaedic Clinic and Policlinic, University Medical Centre Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
University of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The sterile latex surgical glove is an important part of protecting both the patient and the surgical team from infections. However, mechanical stress can damage the integrity of the glove material and thus may lead to infections. (2) Method: A total of 896 gloves from 448 surgeries were tested and evaluated by the water tightening test according to EN455 and ASTM D5151-19. (3) Results: From 448 surgeries, 18.8% of the interventions showed glove damage. In vascular surgery, gloves were damaged in 20.8%, in thoracic surgery 9.1%, in laparoscopic interventions 21.7%, in the subgroup hernia surgeries (TAPP) 17.6% and in open interventions 17.6%. A total of 101 damages were found on 896 gloves; one glove could have several damages. During vascular surgery, 60% of the damages were on the subordinated hand of the surgeon, and 73.3% of the damages had a size of 1 mm. In laparoscopic procedures, the subordinated hand was also more frequently affected (61.3%) than the dominant hand; 64.5% of the damages were 1 mm in size. In the hernia surgery subgroup (TAPP), no damage was larger than 1 mm; 66.7% were in the subordinated hand area. The duration of surgery had no influence on the lesion rate. (4) Conclusion: The damage rate in low impact procedures is high and represents an underestimated problem in soft tissue surgery. The use of single gloving can therefore lead to the risk of infection. EN455 and ASTM D5151-19 does not take into consideration the risk of intraoperative lesions. Double gloving and glove change algorithms should be established.

Indexed as

ASTM D5151-19EN455general surgerymicroperforationssurgical side infections

Identifiers

PMID34501334
PMCPMC8432096
OpenAlexW3197411828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.