Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34501222›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK.

Majid Moshirfar, Rachel Huynh, Nour Bundogji, Alyson N Tukan, Thomas M Sant, Shannon E McCabe, William B West, Kirk Drennan, Yasmyne C Ronquillo, Phillip C Hoopes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Special Issue on Refractive Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Majid MoshirfarHoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT 84020, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1024-6250
Rachel HuynhUniversity of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6473-1940
Nour BundogjiUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.
Alyson N TukanUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.
Thomas M SantUniversity of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Shannon E McCabeHoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT 84020, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6339-3628
William B WestUniversity of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Kirk DrennanHoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT 84020, USA.
Yasmyne C RonquilloHoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT 84020, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8852-4380
Phillip C HoopesHoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT 84020, USA.

Funding

Research to Prevent Blindness Unrestricted Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated safety and efficacy using 6.0 and 6.5 mm optical zones in the WaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System but have not evaluated if differing optical zone sizes influence refractive outcomes. This study examines visual outcomes between two study populations undergoing LASIK with either a 6.0 mm (1332 patients) or 6.5 mm (1332 patients) optical zone. Outcomes were further stratified by severity of myopia (low, moderate, and high) and astigmatism (low and high). Patients were matched by age and preoperative manifest sphere and cylinder. Postoperative measurements were then compared. The 6.5 mm group demonstrated better postoperative manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), manifest sphere, and absolute value of the difference in actual and target spherical equivalent refraction (|∆ SEQ|), within the total population, moderate myopia, and low astigmatism groups, but this did not lead to improved postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) or best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Though astigmatic correction and postoperative angle of error were similar between optical zone sizes, they were significantly worse with high myopia. Overall, this study demonstrates differences in visual outcomes between the 6.0 and 6.5 mm optical zone sizes that may warrant consideration; however, essentially, the results are comparable between them.

Indexed as

6.0 mm6.5 mmAllegrettoastigmatismdry eye syndromeLASIKmyopiaoptical zone sizerefractive outcomesSPK

Identifiers

PMID34501222
PMCPMC8432203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.