Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34501185›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Image Processing of Mg-Al-Sn Alloy Microstructures for Determining Phase Ratios and Grain Size and Correction with Manual Measurement.

Ali Ercetin, Fatih Akkoyun, Ercan Şimşir, Danil Yurievich Pimenov, Khaled Giasin, Manjunath Patel Gowdru Chandrashekarappa, Avinash Lakshmikanthan, Szymon Wojciechowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ali ErcetinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Bingol University, Bingöl 12000, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7631-1361
Fatih AkkoyunDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın 09010, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1432-8926
Ercan ŞimşirDepartment of Transportation Services, Sultandağı Vocational School, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar 03900, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6655-2324
Danil Yurievich PimenovDepartment of Automated Mechanical Engineering, South Ural State University, Lenin Prosp. 76, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5568-8928
Khaled GiasinSchool of Mechanical and Design Engineering, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3DJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3992-8602
Manjunath Patel Gowdru ChandrashekarappaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, PES Institute of Technology and Management, Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi 590018, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9340-7464
Avinash LakshmikanthanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, Bengaluru 560064, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6454-2904
Szymon WojciechowskiFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3380-4588

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of microstructures for the accurate control of material properties is of industrial relevance. Identification and characterization of microstructural properties by manual measurement are often slow, labour intensive, and have a lack of repeatability. In the present work, the intermetallic phase ratio and grain size in the microstructure of known Mg-Sn-Al alloys were measured by computer vision (CV) technology. New Mg (Magnesium) alloys with different alloying element contents were selected as the work materials. Mg alloys (Mg-Al-Sn) were produced using the hot-pressing powder metallurgy technique. The alloys were sintered at 620 °C under 50 MPa pressure in an argon gas atmosphere. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were taken for all the fabricated alloys (three alloys: Mg-7Al-5Sn, Mg-8Al-5Sn, Mg-9Al-5Sn). From the SEM images, the grain size was counted manually and automatically with the application of CV technology. The obtained results were evaluated by correcting automated grain counting procedures with manual measurements. The accuracy of the automated counting technique for determining the grain count exceeded 92% compared to the manual counting procedure. In addition, ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) grain sizes were accurately calculated (approximately 99% accuracy) according to the determined grain counts in the SEM images. Hence, a successful approach was proposed by calculating the ASTM grain sizes of each alloy with respect to manual and automated counting methods. The intermetallic phases (Mg

Indexed as

automated countingcomputer visiongrain sizeimage processingintermetallic phasesmicrostructure

Identifiers

PMID34501185
PMCPMC8434359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.