Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34501143›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Adhesive-Ceramic Interface Behavior in Dental Restorations. FEM Study and SEM Investigation.

Otilia Chirca, Cornelia Biclesanu, Anamaria Florescu, Dan Ioan Stoia, Anna Maria Pangica, Alexandru Burcea, Marius Vasilescu, Iulian Vasile Antoniac

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Otilia ChircaOrganizing Institution of University Doctoral Studies, Doctoral School of Dentistry, "Titu Maiorescu" University, 67A Gh. Petrascu Street, 040441 Bucharest, Romania.
Cornelia BiclesanuFaculty of Dental Medicine, "Titu Maiorescu" University, 67A Gh. Petrascu Street, 040441 Bucharest, Romania.
Anamaria FlorescuFaculty of Dental Medicine, "Titu Maiorescu" University, 67A Gh. Petrascu Street, 040441 Bucharest, Romania.
Dan Ioan StoiaDepartment of Mechanics and Strength of Materials, Politehnica University of Timisoara, 1 Mihai Viteazul Avenue, 300222 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-2106-2238
Anna Maria PangicaFaculty of Dental Medicine, "Titu Maiorescu" University, 67A Gh. Petrascu Street, 040441 Bucharest, Romania.
Alexandru BurceaFaculty of Dental Medicine, "Titu Maiorescu" University, 67A Gh. Petrascu Street, 040441 Bucharest, Romania.
Marius VasilescuDepartment of Materials Science and Physical Metallurgy, Faculty of Material Science and Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7919-1924
Iulian Vasile AntoniacDepartment of Materials Science and Physical Metallurgy, Faculty of Material Science and Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0112-3494
Titu Maiorescu University · ROUniversitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București · ROPolytechnic University of Timişoara · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the stress levels that act in inlay and onlay restorations, according to the direction and value of the external force applied. The study was conducted using the Finite Element Method (FEM) of three types of ceramics: pressed lithium disilicate and monolith, zirconia, and three different adhesive systems: self-adhesive, universal, and dual-cure cements. In addition to FEM, the inlay/onlay-dental structure interface analysis was performed by means of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The geometric models were reconstructed based on computer tomography images of an undamaged molar followed by geometrical procedures of inducing the inlay and onlay reconstructions. The two functional models were then simulated for different orientations of external force and different material properties, according to the considered adhesives and ceramics. The Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was conducted on 30 extracted teeth, divided into three groups according to the adhesive cement type. Both FEM simulation and SEM investigations reveal very good mechanical behavior of the adhesive-dental structure and adhesive-ceramic interfaces for inlay and onlay reconstructions. All results lead to the conclusion that a physiological mastication force applied, regardless of direction, cannot produce a mechanical failure of either inlay or onlay reconstructions. The adhesive bond between the restorations and the dental structure can stabilize the ceramic restorations, resulting in a higher strength to the action of external forces.

Indexed as

adhesive luting systemsdental ceramicsFEM simulationinterfaceSEM investigation

Identifiers

PMID34501143
PMCPMC8433907
OpenAlexW3197536567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.