Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34501102›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Numerical Reliability Study Based on Rheological Input for Bingham Paste Pumping Using a Finite Volume Approach in OpenFOAM.

Robin De Schryver, Khadija El Cheikh, Karel Lesage, Mert Yücel Yardimci, Geert De Schutter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robin De SchryverMagnel-Vandepitte Laboratory, Department of Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 60, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3941-4385
Khadija El CheikhMagnel-Vandepitte Laboratory, Department of Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 60, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3841-3196
Karel LesageMagnel-Vandepitte Laboratory, Department of Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 60, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3891-7036
Mert Yücel YardimciMagnel-Vandepitte Laboratory, Department of Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 60, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0713-0361
Geert De SchutterMagnel-Vandepitte Laboratory, Department of Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 60, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5603-2616
Ghent University · BE

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 693755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rheological quantification is important in many industries, the concrete industry in particular, e.g., pumping, form filling, etc. Instead of performing expensive and time-consuming experiments, numerical simulations are a powerful means in view of rheological assessment. However, due to the unclear numerical reliability and the uncertainty of rheological input data, it is important for the construction industry to assess the numerical outcome. To reduce the numerical domain of cementitious suspensions, we assessed the numerical finite volume simulations of Bingham paste pumping flows in OpenFOAM. We analysed the numerical reliability, first, irrespective of its rheological input by comparison with the literature and theory, and second, dependent on a certain rheological quantification by comparison with pumping experiments. Irrespective of the rheological input, the numerical results were significantly accurate. Dependent on the rheological input, a numerical mismatch, however, existed. Errors below 1% can be expected for proposed numerical rules of thumb: a bi-viscous regularisation, with pressure numbers higher than 5/4. To improve bias due to uncertain rheology, a rheological configuration close to the engineer's aimed application should be used. However, important phenomena should not be overlooked. Further assessment for lubrication flows, in, e.g., concrete pumping, is still necessary to address concerns of reliability and stability.

Indexed as

Bingham rheologycementitious materialscomputational fluid dynamicsnumerical simulationOpenFOAMpumpingreliability

Identifiers

PMID34501102
PMCPMC8434221
OpenAlexW3196683383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.