ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Automatic Identification of Analogue Series from Large Compound Data Sets: Methods and Applications.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- SPLIF-Enhanced Attention-Driven 3D CNNs for Precise and Reliable Protein-Ligand Interaction Modeling for METTL3.ACS omega · 2025Article
- ZINC-22─A Free Multi-Billion-Scale Database of Tangible Compounds for Ligand Discovery.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
- Data-Driven Approaches Used for Compound Library Design for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Cheminformatics and artificial intelligence for accelerating agrochemical discovery.Frontiers in chemistry · 2023Review
- Scaffold Generator: a Java library implementing molecular scaffold functionalities in the Chemistry Development Kit (CDK).Journal of cheminformatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analogue series play a key role in drug discovery. They arise naturally in lead optimization efforts where analogues are explored based on one or a few core structures. However, it is much harder to accurately identify and extract pairs or series of analogue molecules in large compound databases with no predefined core structures. This methodological review outlines the most common and recent methodological developments to automatically identify analogue series in large libraries. Initial approaches focused on using predefined rules to extract scaffold structures, such as the popular Bemis-Murcko scaffold. Later on, the matched molecular pair concept led to efficient algorithms to identify similar compounds sharing a common core structure by exploring many putative scaffolds for each compound. Further developments of these ideas yielded, on the one hand, approaches for hierarchical scaffold decomposition and, on the other hand, algorithms for the extraction of analogue series based on single-site modifications (so-called matched molecular series) by exploring potential scaffold structures based on systematic molecule fragmentation. Eventually, further development of these approaches resulted in methods for extracting analogue series defined by a single core structure with several substitution sites that allow convenient representations, such as R-group tables. These methods enable the efficient analysis of large data sets with hundreds of thousands or even millions of compounds and have spawned many related methodological developments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.