ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Computational Prediction of Compound-Protein Interactions for Orphan Targets Using CGBVS.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A general prediction model for compound-protein interactions based on deep learning.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A variety of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based (Machine Learning) techniques have been developed with regard to in silico prediction of Compound-Protein interactions (CPI)-one of which is a technique we refer to as chemical genomics-based virtual screening (CGBVS). Prediction calculations done via pairwise kernel-based support vector machine (SVM) is the main feature of CGBVS which gives high prediction accuracy, with simple implementation and easy handling. We studied whether the CGBVS technique can identify ligands for targets without ligand information (orphan targets) using data from G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) families. As the validation method, we tested whether the ligand prediction was correct for a virtual orphan GPCR in which all ligand information for one selected target was omitted from the training data. We have specifically expressed the results of this study as applicability index and developed a method to determine whether CGBVS can be used to predict GPCR ligands. Validation results showed that the prediction accuracy of each GPCR differed greatly, but models using Multiple Sequence Alignment (MSA) as the protein descriptor performed well in terms of overall prediction accuracy. We also discovered that the effect of the type compound descriptors on the prediction accuracy was less significant than that of the type of protein descriptors used. Furthermore, we found that the accuracy of the ligand prediction depends on the amount of ligand information with regard to GPCRs related to the target. Additionally, the prediction accuracy tends to be high if a large amount of ligand information for related proteins is used in the training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.