Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34500046›Full record

ReviewAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2021

Therapeutic cancer vaccines revamping: technology advancements and pitfalls.

G Antonarelli, C Corti, P Tarantino, L Ascione, J Cortes, P Romero, E A Mittendorf, M L Disis, G Curigliano

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06471673 (A Study of BRIA-OTS Cellular Immunotherapy in Metastatic Recurrent Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06471673 phase1 / phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Study of BRIA-OTS Cellular Immunotherapy in Metastatic Recurrent Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorBriaCell Therapeutics CorporationRan2024 to 2025Enrolled18ConditionsBreast Cancer, Breast Tumor, Cancer of Breast, Cancer of the BreastArmsBC1 cell line, Bria-OTS regimen and CPI (tislelizumab), Bria-OTS regimen and CPI (tislelizumab) expansion cohort
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Vaccines in Breast Cancer: Challenges and Breakthroughs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

G AntonarelliDivision of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haematology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
C CortiDivision of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haematology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
P TarantinoDivision of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haematology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
L AscioneDivision of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haematology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
J CortesInternational Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Quironsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
P RomeroDepartment of Fundamental Oncology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
E A MittendorfDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, USA.
M L DisisUW Medicine Cancer Vaccine Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
G CuriglianoDivision of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haematology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: giuseppe.curigliano@ieo.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer vaccines (CVs) represent a long-sought therapeutic and prophylactic immunotherapy strategy to obtain antigen (Ag)-specific T-cell responses and potentially achieve long-term clinical benefit. However, historically, most CV clinical trials have resulted in disappointing outcomes, despite promising signs of immunogenicity across most formulations. In the past decade, technological advances regarding vaccine delivery platforms, tools for immunogenomic profiling, and Ag/epitope selection have occurred. Consequently, the ability of CVs to induce tumor-specific and, in some cases, remarkable clinical responses have been observed in early-phase clinical trials. It is notable that the record-breaking speed of vaccine development in response to the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic mainly relied on manufacturing infrastructures and technological platforms already developed for CVs. In turn, research, clinical data, and infrastructures put in place for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic can further speed CV development processes. This review outlines the main technological advancements as well as major issues to tackle in the development of CVs. Possible applications for unmet clinical needs will be described, putting into perspective the future of cancer vaccinology.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesCOVID-19NeoplasmsHumansSARS-CoV-2TechnologyCancer Vaccinescancerimmunotherapiesvaccines

Identifiers

PMID34500046
PMCPMC8420263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.