Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34499863›Full record

Observational studyThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2022

Comparison of three tests for latent tuberculosis infection in high-risk people in the USA: an observational cohort study.

Christine S Ho, Pei-Jean I Feng, Masahiro Narita, Jason E Stout, Michael Chen, Lisa Pascopella, Richard Garfein, Randall Reves, Dolly J Katz, Tuberculosis Epidemiologic Studies Consortium

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01622140 (Prospective Comparison of the Tuberculin Skin Test and Interferon-Gamma Release Assays in Diagnosing Infection With Mycobacterium Tuberculosis and in Predicting Progression to Tuberculosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01622140 completednot on this map

Prospective Comparison of the Tuberculin Skin Test and Interferon-Gamma Release Assays in Diagnosing Infection With Mycobacterium Tuberculosis and in Predicting Progression to Tuberculosis

TypeobservationalSponsorCenters for Disease Control and PreventionRan2012 to 2020Enrolled21,334ConditionsLatent Tuberculosis Infection, Tuberculosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Immune Sensitization toPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparison of Two Interferon-Gamma Release Assays for Pediatric Tuberculosis Infection.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2025
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Association ofJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2023
    Article
  11. Trends in tuberculosis clinicians' adoption of short-course regimens for latent tuberculosis infection.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A narrative review of tuberculosis in the United States among persons aged 65 years and older.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2022
    Review
  20. Variability of interferon-γ release assays in people at high risk of tuberculosis infection or progression to tuberculosis disease living in the United States.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Christine S HoDivision of Tuberculosis Elimination, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: gtb9@cdc.gov.
Pei-Jean I FengDivision of Tuberculosis Elimination, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Masahiro NaritaTB Control Program, Public Health-Seattle and King County, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jason E StoutDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Michael ChenDivision of Tuberculosis Elimination, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Lisa PascopellaTuberculosis Control Branch, Division of Communicable Disease Control, Center for Infectious Diseases, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA, USA.
Richard GarfeinDivision of Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Randall RevesDenver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, USA.
Dolly J KatzDivision of Tuberculosis Elimination, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Tuberculosis Epidemiologic Studies Consortium
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USCalifornia Department of Public Health · USDuke Medical Center · USHealth and Hospital Corporation · USPublic Health – Seattle & King County · US

Funding

Together: Transforming and Translating Discovery to Improve HealthKL2TR001429 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI GUIRGIS, FAHEEM W, LEEUWENBURGH, CHRISTIAAN · 2015 to 2023
$5.5M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001429NIAID NIH HHS L30 AI146934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of latent tuberculosis infection is an important strategy to prevent tuberculosis disease. In the USA, three tests are used to identify latent tuberculosis infection: the tuberculin skin test (TST) and two IFN-γ release assays (T-SPOT.TB and QuantiFERON). To our knowledge, few large studies have compared all three tests among people at high risk of latent tuberculosis infection or progression to tuberculosis disease. We aimed to assess test agreement between IFN-γ release assays and TST to provide guidance on their use in important risk groups.

methodsIn this observational cohort study, we enrolled participants at high risk of latent tuberculosis infection or progression to tuberculosis disease at ten US sites with 18 affiliated clinics, including close contacts of infectious tuberculosis cases, people born in countries whose populations in the USA have high (≥100 cases per 100 000 people) or moderate (10-99 cases per 100 000 people) tuberculosis incidence, and people with HIV. Participants were interviewed about demographics and medical risk factors, and all three tests were administered to each participant. The primary endpoints for this study were the proportions of positive test results by test type stratified by risk group and test concordance by risk group for participants with valid results for all three test types. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01622140.

findingsBetween July 12, 2012, and May 5, 2017, 26 292 people were approached and 22 131 (84·2%) were enrolled in the study. Data from 21 846 (98·7%) participants were available for analysis, including 3790 (17·3%) born in the USA and 18 023 (82·5%) born outside the USA. Among non-US-born participants overall, the RR comparing the proportions of TST-positive results (7476 [43·2%] of 17 306 participants) to QuantiFERON-positive results (4732 [26·5%] of 17 882 participants) was 1·6 (95% CI 1·6-1·7). The risk ratio (RR) for the comparison with the proportion of T-SPOT.TB-positive results (3693 [21·6%] of 17 118 participants) was 2·0 (95% CI 1·9-2·1). US-born participants had less variation in the proportions of positive results across all tests. The RRs for the proportion of TST-positive results (391 [10·9%] of 3575 participants) compared with the proportion of QuantiFERON-positive results (445 [12·0%] of 3693 participants) and T-SPOT.TB-positive results (295 [8·1%] of 3638 participants) were 0·9 (95% CI 0·8-1·0) and 1·3 (1·2-1·6), respectively. 20 149 (91·0%) of 21 846 participants had results for all three tests, including 16 712 (76%) non-US-born participants. Discordance between TST and IFN-γ release assay results varied by age among non-US-born participants and was greatest among the 848 non-US-born children younger than 5 years. 204 (87·2%) of 234 non-US-born children younger than 5 years with at least one positive test were TST-positive and IFN-γ release assay-negative. The proportion of non-US-born participants who were TST-negative but IFN-γ release assay-positive ranged from one (0·5%) of 199 children younger than 2 years to 86 (14·5%) of 594 participants aged 65 years and older (p

interpretationOur findings support the preferential use of IFN-γ release assays for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis in high-risk populations, especially in very young and older people born outside the USA.

fundingUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantInterferon-gamma Release TestsLatent TuberculosisMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceProspective StudiesReagent Kits, DiagnosticReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID34499863
PMCPMC8712384
OpenAlexW3197450787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.