ReviewThe Annals of thoracic surgery2022
Dissemination and Implementation Science in Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Review and Case Study.
Review in The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adherence to Postoperative Survivorship Quality Metrics in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- A beginner's guide to implementation science.JTCVS techniques · 2025Article
- Early-Stage Lung Cancer in the Era of Lung Cancer Screening: Veterans Health Administration Outperforms Other Insurance Models.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Research designs for cardiothoracic surgeons: part 1 - a primer for evidence-based practice.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2024Article
- Validation of a novel donor lung scoring system based on the updated lung Composite Allocation Score.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2024Article
- Development and validation of the lung donor (LUNDON) acceptability score for pulmonary transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2023Article
- Association between imaging surveillance frequency and outcomes following surgical treatment of early-stage lung cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Article
- Association Between Surgical Quality Metric Adherence and Overall Survival Among US Veterans With Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.JAMA surgery · 2023Article
- Dissemination and implementation analysis of the Ross procedure in adults: time to update the guidelines?The cardiothoracic surgeon · 2023Article
- Assessment of short readmissions following elective pulmonary lobectomy.American journal of surgery · 2023Article
- The Future of Cardiothoracic Surgical Critical Care Medicine as a Medical Science: A Call to Action.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- Pilot Study of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Esophageal Cancer After Esophagectomy.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dissemination and implementation (D&I) science is the practice of taking evidence-based interventions and sustainably incorporating them into routine clinical practice. As a relatively young field, D&I techniques are underutilized in cardiothoracic surgery. This review offers an overview of D&I science from the context of the cardiothoracic surgeon. First, we provide a general introduction to D&I science and basic terminology that is used in the field. Second, to illustrate D&I techniques in a real-world example, we discuss a case study for implementing lung protective management strategies for lung donor optimization nationally. Finally, we discuss challenges to successful implementation that are unique to cardiothoracic surgery and give several examples of evidence-based interventions that have been poorly implemented into surgical practice. We also provide examples of successful D&I interventions-including deimplementation strategies-from other surgical subspecialties. We hope that this review offers additional tools for cardiothoracic surgeons to explore when introducing evidence-based interventions into routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.