Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34499656›Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

A proposed framework for the development and qualitative evaluation of West Nile virus models and their application to local public health decision-making.

Alexander C Keyel, Morgan E Gorris, Ilia Rochlin, Johnny A Uelmen, Luis F Chaves, Gabriel L Hamer, Imelda K Moise, Marta Shocket, A Marm Kilpatrick, Nicholas B DeFelice and 13 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Alexander C KeyelDivision of Infectious Diseases, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5256-6274
Morgan E GorrisInformation Systems and Modeling & Center for Nonlinear Studies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Ilia RochlinCenter for Vector Biology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7680-6965
Johnny A UelmenDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3057-5107
Luis F ChavesInstituto Costarricense de Investigación y Enseñanza en Nutrición y Salud (INCIENSA), Tres Rios, Cartago, Costa Rica.ORCID 0000-0002-5301-2764
Gabriel L HamerDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Imelda K MoiseDepartment of Geography & Regional Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, United States of America.
Marta ShocketDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8995-4446
A Marm KilpatrickDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3612-5775
Nicholas B DeFeliceDepartment of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3551-6587
Justin K DavisDepartment of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, United States of America.
Eliza LittleConnecticut Agricultural Experimental Station, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Patrick IrwinNorthwest Mosquito Abatement District, Wheeling, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3117-2457
Andrew J TyreSchool of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America.
Kelly Helm SmithNational Drought Mitigation Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5229-984X
Chris L FredregillMosquito and Vector Control Division, Harris County Public Health, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2200-6169
Oliver Elison TimmDepartment of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University at Albany, Albany, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8871-0602
Karen M HolcombDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of California Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9403-3756
Michael C WimberlyDepartment of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1549-3891
Matthew J WardEnvironmental Analytics Group, Universities Space Research Association, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8373-8438
Christopher M BarkerDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of California Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7941-346X
Charlotte G RhodesDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Rebecca L SmithDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8343-794X

Funding

ACL HHS U01CK000510ACL HHS U01CK000512ACL HHS U01CK000516NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000505NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000509NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000510NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000512NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

West Nile virus (WNV) is a globally distributed mosquito-borne virus of great public health concern. The number of WNV human cases and mosquito infection patterns vary in space and time. Many statistical models have been developed to understand and predict WNV geographic and temporal dynamics. However, these modeling efforts have been disjointed with little model comparison and inconsistent validation. In this paper, we describe a framework to unify and standardize WNV modeling efforts nationwide. WNV risk, detection, or warning models for this review were solicited from active research groups working in different regions of the United States. A total of 13 models were selected and described. The spatial and temporal scales of each model were compared to guide the timing and the locations for mosquito and virus surveillance, to support mosquito vector control decisions, and to assist in conducting public health outreach campaigns at multiple scales of decision-making. Our overarching goal is to bridge the existing gap between model development, which is usually conducted as an academic exercise, and practical model applications, which occur at state, tribal, local, or territorial public health and mosquito control agency levels. The proposed model assessment and comparison framework helps clarify the value of individual models for decision-making and identifies the appropriate temporal and spatial scope of each model. This qualitative evaluation clearly identifies gaps in linking models to applied decisions and sets the stage for a quantitative comparison of models. Specifically, whereas many coarse-grained models (county resolution or greater) have been developed, the greatest need is for fine-grained, short-term planning models (m-km, days-weeks) that remain scarce. We further recommend quantifying the value of information for each decision to identify decisions that would benefit most from model input.

Indexed as

Decision MakingModels, BiologicalPublic Health AdministrationHumansWest Nile Fever

Identifiers

PMID34499656
PMCPMC8428767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.