Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34499532›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2021

Work Redesign for the 21st Century: Promising Strategies for Enhancing Worker Well-Being.

Meg Lovejoy, Erin L Kelly, Laura D Kubzansky, Lisa F Berkman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. FromAnnals of global health · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Childhood Maltreatment and Adult Work Absenteeism: Work Meaningfulness as a Double-Edged Sword.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Expanding the Focus of Occupational Safety and Health: Lessons from a Series of Linked Scientific Meetings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meg LovejoyMeg Lovejoy is with the Workplace and Well-Being Initiative, Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA. Erin L. Kelly is with the MIT Institute for Work and Employment Research and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management, Cambridge. Laura D. Kubzansky is with the Lee Kum Sheung Center for Health and Happiness and the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA. Lisa F. Berkman is with the Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies and the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health.
Erin L KellyMeg Lovejoy is with the Workplace and Well-Being Initiative, Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA. Erin L. Kelly is with the MIT Institute for Work and Employment Research and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management, Cambridge. Laura D. Kubzansky is with the Lee Kum Sheung Center for Health and Happiness and the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA. Lisa F. Berkman is with the Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies and the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health.
Laura D KubzanskyMeg Lovejoy is with the Workplace and Well-Being Initiative, Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA. Erin L. Kelly is with the MIT Institute for Work and Employment Research and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management, Cambridge. Laura D. Kubzansky is with the Lee Kum Sheung Center for Health and Happiness and the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA. Lisa F. Berkman is with the Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies and the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health.
Lisa F BerkmanMeg Lovejoy is with the Workplace and Well-Being Initiative, Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA. Erin L. Kelly is with the MIT Institute for Work and Employment Research and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management, Cambridge. Laura D. Kubzansky is with the Lee Kum Sheung Center for Health and Happiness and the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA. Lisa F. Berkman is with the Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies and the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Work is a key social determinant of population health and well-being. Yet, efforts to improve worker well-being in the United States are often focused on changing individual health behaviors via employer wellness programs. The COVID-19 health crisis has brought into sharp relief some of the limitations of current approaches, revealing structural conditions that heighten the vulnerability of workers and their families to physical and psychosocial stressors. To address these gaps, we build on existing frameworks and work redesign research to propose a model of work redesign updated for the 21st century that identifies strategies to reshape work conditions that are a root cause of stress-related health problems. These strategies include increasing worker schedule control and voice, moderating job demands, and providing training and employer support aimed at enhancing social relations at work. We conclude that work redesign offers new and viable directions for improving worker well-being and that guidance from federal and state governments could encourage the adoption and effective implementation of such initiatives. (

Indexed as

Health PolicyOccupational HealthSocial Determinants of HealthCOVID-19HumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2United StatesWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID34499532
PMCPMC8561169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.