Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34499316›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2021

Genomic profiling using the UltraSEEK panel identifies discordancy between paired primary and breast cancer brain metastases and an association with brain metastasis-free survival.

Athina Giannoudis, Alexander Sartori, Lee Eastoe, Rasheed Zakaria, Christopher Charlton, Nicholas Hickson, Angela Platt-Higgins, Philip S Rudland, Darryl Irwin, Michael D Jenkinson and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Genomic and immune profiling of breast cancer brain metastases.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Association ofFrontiers in neurology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Athina GiannoudisInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK.
Alexander SartoriAgena Bioscience GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Lee EastoeAgena Bioscience GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Rasheed ZakariaInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK.
Christopher CharltonManchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Nicholas HicksonManchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Angela Platt-HigginsInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK.
Philip S RudlandInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK.
Darryl IrwinAgena Bioscience GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Michael D JenkinsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Carlo PalmieriInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK. c.palmieri@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9496-2718
University of Liverpool · GBManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBrain metastases (BM) are an increasing clinical problem. This study aimed to assess paired primary breast cancers (BC) and BM for aberrations within TP53, PIK3CA, ESR1, ERBB2 and AKT utilising the MassARRAY® UltraSEEK® technology (Agena Bioscience, San Diego, USA).

methodsDNA isolated from 32 paired primary BCs and BMs was screened using the custom UltraSEEK® Breast Cancer Panel. Data acquisition and analysis was performed by the Agena Bioscience Typer software v4.0.26.74.

resultsMutations were identified in 91% primary BCs and 88% BM cases. TP53, AKT1, ESR1, PIK3CA and ERBB2 genes were mutated in 68.8%, 37.5%, 31.3%, 28.1% and 3.1% respectively of primary BCs and in 59.4%, 37.5%, 28.1%, 28.1% and 3.1% respectively of BMs. Differences in the mutations within the 5 genes between BC and paired BM were identified in 62.5% of paired cases. In primary BCs, ER-positive/HER2-negative cases harboured the most mutations (70%), followed by ER-positive/HER2-positive (15%) and triple-negatives (13.4%), whereas in BMs, the highest number of mutations was observed in triple-negative (52.5%), followed by ER-positive/HER2-negative (35.6%) and ER-negative/HER2-positive (12%). There was a significant association between the number of mutations in the primary BC and breast-to-brain metastasis-free survival (p = 0.0001) but not with overall survival (p = 0.056).

conclusionThese data demonstrate the discordancy between primary BC and BM, as well as the presence of clinically important, actionable mutations in BCBM. The UltraSEEK® Breast Cancer Panel provides a tool for BCBM that can be utilised to direct more tailored treatment decisions and for clinical studies investigating targeted agents.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBreastErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGenomicsHumansMutationBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesBrain metastasisBreast cancerMutationsUltraSEEK®

Identifiers

PMID34499316
PMCPMC8558178
OpenAlexW3157246491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.