Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34499298›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2022

FIRST REPORT OF GENUS Cryptosporidium IN CERVIDS SPECIES: Mazama americana, Mazama nana AND Blastocerus dichotomus.

Weslen Fabricio Pires Teixeira, Márcio Leite de Oliveira, Pedro Henrique de Faria Peres, Bruno César Miranda Oliveira, Walter Bertequini Nagata, Dielson da Silva Vieira, Anassilton Moreira de Andrade Junior, Elis Domingos Ferrari, José Maurício Barbanti Duarte, Marcelo Vasconcelos Meireles and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular Epidemiological Survey ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Weslen Fabricio Pires TeixeiraDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Márcio Leite de OliveiraSchool of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro Henrique de Faria PeresSchool of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Bruno César Miranda OliveiraDepartment of Support, Production and Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Walter Bertequini NagataDepartment of Support, Production and Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Dielson da Silva VieiraDepartment of Clinic, Surgery and Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil. dielsonveterinario@gmail.com.
Anassilton Moreira de Andrade JuniorDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Elis Domingos FerrariDepartment of Support, Production and Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
José Maurício Barbanti DuarteSchool of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo Vasconcelos MeirelesDepartment of Clinic, Surgery and Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Welber Daniel Zanetti LopesDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Katia Denise Saraiva BrescianiDepartment of Support, Production and Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico #304456/2016-0Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico #407777/2016Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo #10/50748-3Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo #12/50206-1Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo #15/10086-5Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo #15/25742-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analyzed Cryptosporidium spp. in fecal samples of wild cervids (Ozotoceros bezoarticus, Blastocerus dichotomus, Mazama nana, Mazama americana, and Mazama bororo) from many Brazilian regions, a fact unprecedented in the literature. Sniffer dogs were used to collect 936 fecal samples of cervids from 14 Brazilian localities. Cervids species were identified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) performed from genomic DNA extracted from 563 fecal samples of Ozotoceros bezoarticus, Blastocerus dichotomus, Mazama nana, Mazama americana, and Mazama bororo. Cryptosporidium spp. oocyst screening was performed using malachite green negative staining. Nested PCR (nPCR) protocols targeting the 18S rRNA and GP60 genes followed by genetic sequencing were performed for Cryptosporidium spp. detection and Cryptosporidium parvum subtyping, respectively. Nested PCR targeting actin gene and genetic sequencing were performed in samples with non-identified Cryptosporidium species by 18S rRNA amplicon sequencing. The association between the occurrence of Cryptosporidium and the presence of bovines in the same locality was evaluated using Fisher's exact test. The positivity rates of diagnostic methods were compared by McNemar test and the Kappa correlation coefficient. The prevalence rates of Cryptosporidium spp. in cervids were 1.42% (8/563) and 0.36% (2/563) by nPCR and malachite green negative staining, respectively. C. parvum IIaA16G3R1 isolate was identified in three fecal samples from M. americana, two from M. nana and one from B. dichotomus. Cryptosporidium ryanae were found in one sample from B. dichotomus. We identified a new Cryptosporidium genotype, named Cryptosporidium deer genotype BR, from one M. americana fecal sample.

Indexed as

CryptosporidiosisCryptosporidiumDeerAnimalsFecesPolymerase Chain ReactionCoccidCryptosporidium ryanaeDeerOocystsSpeciesWildlife

Identifiers

PMID34499298
OpenAlexW3198898272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.