Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34499249›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2021

Quantitative ultrasound imaging of soft biological tissues: a primer for radiologists and medical physicists.

Guy Cloutier, François Destrempes, François Yu, An Tang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04396288 (Characterization of Intra-osseous Vascular Response With Ultrasound Imaging on Healthy Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04396288 nacompletednot on this map

Characterization of Intra-osseous Vascular Response With Ultrasound Imaging on Healthy Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, FranceRan2021 to 2024Enrolled19ConditionsBlood Circulation Disorder, Bone Diseases, MetabolicArmsultrasound imaging at the forearm and at the tibia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Thoracolumbar fascia ultrasound and elastography biomarkers in low back pain: a systematic review of associations and responsiveness to intervention.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guy CloutierLaboratory of Biorheology and Medical Ultrasonics, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), 900 St-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada. guy.cloutier@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4957-4844
François DestrempesLaboratory of Biorheology and Medical Ultrasonics, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), 900 St-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada.
François YuDepartment of Radiology, Radio-oncology, and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
An TangDepartment of Radiology, Radio-oncology, and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Funding

CIHR #389385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) aims at quantifying interactions between ultrasound and biological tissues. QUS techniques extract fundamental physical properties of tissues based on interactions between ultrasound waves and tissue microstructure. These techniques provide quantitative information on sub-resolution properties that are not visible on grayscale (B-mode) imaging. Quantitative data may be represented either as a global measurement or as parametric maps overlaid on B-mode images. Recently, major ultrasound manufacturers have released speed of sound, attenuation, and backscatter packages for tissue characterization and imaging. Established and emerging clinical applications are currently limited and include liver fibrosis staging, liver steatosis grading, and breast cancer characterization. On the other hand, most biological tissues have been studied using experimental QUS methods, and quantitative datasets are available in the literature. This educational review addresses the general topic of biological soft tissue characterization using QUS, with a focus on disseminating technical concepts for clinicians and specialized QUS materials for medical physicists. Advanced but simplified technical descriptions are also provided in separate subsections identified as such. To understand QUS methods, this article reviews types of ultrasound waves, basic concepts of ultrasound wave propagation, ultrasound image formation, point spread function, constructive and destructive wave interferences, radiofrequency data processing, and a summary of different imaging modes. For each major QUS technique, topics include: concept, illustrations, clinical examples, pitfalls, and future directions.

Indexed as

Backscatter coefficientBackscatter imagingQuantitative ultrasound imagingSpeed of sound imagingUltrasound attenuation imaging

Identifiers

PMID34499249
PMCPMC8429541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.