Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34499232›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2022

Prognostic predictors and echocardiographic time course after device replacement in patients treated chronically with cardiac resynchronization therapy devices.

Takahiko Nagase, Maya Ishiguro, Kei Mabuchi, Ruiko Seki, So Asano, Hiroshi Fukunaga, Kanki Inoue, Yukio Sekiguchi, Kohei Tanizaki, Mamoru Nanasato and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takahiko NagaseDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, 3-16-1 Asahi-cho, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo, 183-0003, Japan. tnagase@shi.heart.or.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2610-1435
Maya IshiguroDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, 3-16-1 Asahi-cho, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo, 183-0003, Japan.
Kei MabuchiDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, 3-16-1 Asahi-cho, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo, 183-0003, Japan.
Ruiko SekiDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, 3-16-1 Asahi-cho, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo, 183-0003, Japan.
So AsanoDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, 3-16-1 Asahi-cho, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo, 183-0003, Japan.
Hiroshi FukunagaDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, 3-16-1 Asahi-cho, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo, 183-0003, Japan.
Kanki InoueDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, 3-16-1 Asahi-cho, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo, 183-0003, Japan.
Yukio SekiguchiDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, 3-16-1 Asahi-cho, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo, 183-0003, Japan.
Kohei TanizakiDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, 3-16-1 Asahi-cho, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo, 183-0003, Japan.
Mamoru NanasatoDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, 3-16-1 Asahi-cho, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo, 183-0003, Japan.
Nobuo IguchiDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, 3-16-1 Asahi-cho, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo, 183-0003, Japan.
Junichi NittaDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, 3-16-1 Asahi-cho, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo, 183-0003, Japan.
Mitsuaki IsobeDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, 3-16-1 Asahi-cho, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo, 183-0003, Japan.
Sakakibara Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognostic predictors of death or heart failure hospitalization and the echocardiographic response after initial cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device replacement (CRT-r) remain unclear. We evaluated the predictors and the echocardiographic time course in patients after CRT-r. Consecutive 60 patients underwent CRT-r because of battery depletion. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the chronic echocardiographic response to CRT (left ventricular end-systolic volume [LVESV] reduction of ≥ 15%) at the time of CRT-r: CRT responders (group A; 35 patients) and CRT nonresponders (group B; 25 patients). The primary endpoint was a composite of death from any cause or heart failure hospitalization. Changes in LVESV and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after CRT-r were also analyzed. During the mean follow-up of 46 ± 33 months after CRT-r, the primary endpoint occurred more frequently in group B (group A versus group B; 8/35 [23%] patients versus 19/25 [76%] patients, p < 0.001). No significant changes in LVESV and LVEF were observed at the mean of 46 ± 29 months after CRT-r in both groups. A multivariate analysis identified echocardiographic nonresponse to CRT, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, and New York Heart Association functional class III or IV at the time of CRT-r as independent predictors of the primary endpoint in all patients. Residual echocardiographic nonresponse, comorbidities, and heart failure symptoms at the time of CRT-r predict the subsequent very long-term prognosis after CRT-r. No further echocardiographic response to CRT was found after CRT-r.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyHeart FailureCardiac Resynchronization Therapy DevicesEchocardiographyHumansPrognosisStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, LeftCardiac resynchronization therapyComorbidityDevice replacementEchocardiographic responsePrognostic predictor

Identifiers

PMID34499232
OpenAlexW3197749357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.