Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34499224›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2022

Predictors for thromboembolism in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.

Christian Pfrepper, Maren Knödler, Ruth Maria Schorling, Daniel Seehofer, Sirak Petros, Florian Lordick

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development of A Risk Assessment Model for Venous Thromboembolism among Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christian PfrepperDepartment of Hematology, Cellular Therapy and Hemostaseology, Division of Hemostaseology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. christian.pfrepper@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0485-7402
Maren KnödlerDepartment of Medicine (Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Pulmonology, and Infectious Diseases), University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Ruth Maria SchorlingDepartment of Medicine (Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Pulmonology, and Infectious Diseases), University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Daniel SeehoferDepartment of Visceral, Vascular, Thoracic and Transplant Surgery, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Sirak PetrosDepartment of Hematology, Cellular Therapy and Hemostaseology, Division of Hemostaseology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Florian LordickDepartment of Medicine (Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Pulmonology, and Infectious Diseases), University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig University · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with cancer are at increased risk of thromboembolic events contributing significantly to cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Because cholangiocarcinoma is a rare type of cancer, the incidence of thromboembolism in this patient population is not well defined.

methodsPatients with cholangiocarcinoma treated at the University Cancer Center Leipzig between January 2014 and December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively regarding the incidence of arterial and venous thromboembolism.

resultsA total of 133 newly and consecutively diagnosed patients were included, of whom 22% had stage IV disease. Thromboembolism was diagnosed in 39 (29.3%), with 48% of the events occurring between 60 days prior and 30 days after the initial diagnosis. Arterial thrombosis accounted for 19% and portal venous thrombosis for 33% of the events, while the rest of events occurred in the non-portal venous system. In multivariable analysis, an ONKOTEV score ≥ 2 was the only independent predictor for thromboembolism. Serum CA 19-9 was available in 87 patients (65.4%). In this subgroup, CA 19-9 above the median of 97.7 U/ml and vascular or lymphatic compression were independent predictors for thromboembolism in the first year and CA 19-9 alone remained a significant predictor over the whole observation period. An ONKOTEV score ≥ 2 and increasing age were predictors of survival.

conclusionsA very high thromboembolic risk was observed in cholangiocarcinoma, comparable to the risk situation in pancreatic and gastric cancer. The ONKOTEV score and serum CA 19-9 are independent predictors of thromboembolic events. Prospective validation of our observations in this patient population is warranted.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaVenous ThromboembolismBile Ducts, IntrahepaticHumansIncidenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsCholangiocarcinomaKhorana scoreONKOTEV scoreRisk predictionThromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID34499224
PMCPMC9349130
OpenAlexW3198765978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.