Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34499052›Full record

ArticleJCI insight2021

Rapid, robust, and sustainable antibody responses to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in convalescent COVID-19 individuals.

Sabrina E Racine-Brzostek, Jim K Yee, Ashley Sukhu, Yuqing Qiu, Sophie Rand, Paul D Barone, Ying Hao, He S Yang, Qing H Meng, Fred S Apple and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCI insight, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Duration of immunity following full vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. COVID-19 Vaccines: An Overview of Different Platforms.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sabrina E Racine-BrzostekDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Jim K YeeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Ashley SukhuDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Yuqing QiuDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Sophie RandDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Paul D BaroneDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Ying HaoSchool of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
He S YangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Qing H MengDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Fred S AppleDepartments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology at Hennepin Healthcare/Hennepin County Medical Center and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Yuanyuan ShiSchool of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Amy ChadburnDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Encouse GoldenDepartment of Radiation Oncology and.
Silvia C FormentiDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Melissa M CushingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Zhen ZhaoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine antibody response under real-world conditions. This longitudinal study investigated the quantity and quality of SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in 846 specimens from 350 patients, comparing BNT162b2-vaccinated individuals (19 previously diagnosed with COVID-19, termed RecoVax; and 49 never diagnosed, termed NaiveVax) with 122 hospitalized unvaccinated (HospNoVax) and 160 outpatient unvaccinated (OutPtNoVax) COVID-19 patients. NaiveVax experienced delay in generating SARS-CoV-2 total antibodies (TAb) and surrogate neutralizing antibodies (SNAb) after the first vaccine dose (D1) but rapid increase in antibody levels after the second dose (D2). However, these never reached RecoVax's robust levels. In fact, NaiveVax TAb and SNAb levels decreased 4 weeks after D2. For the most part, RecoVax TAb persisted, after reaching maximal levels 2 weeks after D2, but SNAb decreased significantly about 6 months after D1. Although NaiveVax avidity lagged behind that of RecoVax for most of the follow-up periods, NaiveVax did reach similar avidity by about 6 months after D1. These data suggest that 1 vaccine dose elicits maximal antibody response in RecoVax and may be sufficient. Also, despite decreasing levels in TAb and SNAb over time, long-term avidity may be a measure worth evaluating and possibly correlating to vaccine efficacy.

Indexed as

Antibody FormationAdultAgedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCohort StudiesCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedmRNA VaccinesSARS-CoV-2VaccinationAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesmRNA VaccinesVaccines, SyntheticAdaptive immunityCOVID-19Immunology

Identifiers

PMID34499052
PMCPMC8564891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.