Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34499051›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2021

Seasonal coronavirus-specific B cells with limited SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactivity dominate the IgG response in severe COVID-19.

Muriel Aguilar-Bretones, Brenda M Westerhuis, Matthijs P Raadsen, Erwin de Bruin, Felicity D Chandler, Nisreen Ma Okba, Bart L Haagmans, Thomas Langerak, Henrik Endeman, Johannes Pc van den Akker and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Muriel Aguilar-BretonesDepartment of Viroscience and.
Brenda M WesterhuisDepartment of Viroscience and.
Matthijs P RaadsenDepartment of Viroscience and.
Erwin de BruinDepartment of Viroscience and.
Felicity D ChandlerDepartment of Viroscience and.
Nisreen Ma OkbaDepartment of Viroscience and.
Bart L HaagmansDepartment of Viroscience and.
Thomas LangerakDepartment of Viroscience and.
Henrik EndemanIntensive Care Unit, Erasmus Medical Center (EMC), Wytemaweg, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Johannes Pc van den AkkerIntensive Care Unit, Erasmus Medical Center (EMC), Wytemaweg, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Diederik Ampj GommersIntensive Care Unit, Erasmus Medical Center (EMC), Wytemaweg, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Eric Cm van GorpDepartment of Viroscience and.
Corine H GeurtsvanKesselDepartment of Viroscience and.
Rory D de VriesDepartment of Viroscience and.
Ron Am FouchierDepartment of Viroscience and.
Barry Hg RockxDepartment of Viroscience and.
Marion Pg KoopmansDepartment of Viroscience and.
Gijsbert P van NieropDepartment of Viroscience and.
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Little is known about the interplay between preexisting immunity to endemic seasonal coronaviruses and the development of a SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG response. We investigated the kinetics, breadth, magnitude, and level of cross-reactivity of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and heterologous seasonal and epidemic coronaviruses at the clonal level in patients with mild or severe COVID-19 as well as in disease control patients. We assessed antibody reactivity to nucleocapsid and spike antigens and correlated this IgG response to SARS-CoV-2 neutralization. Patients with COVID-19 mounted a mostly type-specific SARS-CoV-2 response. Additionally, IgG clones directed against a seasonal coronavirus were boosted in patients with severe COVID-19. These boosted clones showed limited cross-reactivity and did not neutralize SARS-CoV-2. These findings indicate a boost of poorly protective CoV-specific antibodies in patients with COVID-19 that correlated with disease severity, revealing "original antigenic sin."

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntibody SpecificityB-LymphocytesCase-Control StudiesCoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCoronavirus Nucleocapsid ProteinsCOVID-19Cross ReactionsFemaleHost Microbial InteractionsHumansImmunoglobulin GAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCoronavirus Nucleocapsid ProteinsImmunoglobulin Gnucleocapsid phosphoprotein, SARS-CoV-2PhosphoproteinsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2ImmunoglobulinsImmunologyImprintingVirology

Identifiers

PMID34499051
PMCPMC8553556
OpenAlexW3197464458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.